Comparison

星耀汇 vs 洽客商城

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

星耀汇

Features
Read full description

【精选好物,品质之选】严选当前热门爆款、口碑尖货,覆盖美妆、3C数码、家居、生活日用品、休闲零食等全品类,满足您日常生活需求,解锁品质生活新体验。 【新人专享,礼遇升级】新用户注册即享百元大礼包!首次购物再叠加专属新人优惠券折扣,让每一分钱都花得超值。 【积分商城,惊喜无限】每日签到、购物消费送积分,积分可兑换精美礼品和积分提现,还能参与积分抽奖,最高有机会抽中扫地机器人,惊喜不断。 【会员尊享,特权加倍】成为星耀会员,解锁专属权益:百元开卡礼包、8折商品特惠购、购物双倍返现等,尊享会员特权,让您购物无忧。

About

洽客商城

Features
Read full description

洽客商城——洽见好物,客享心动 洽客商城是一款专注于高性价比购物的电商APP,汇聚海量优质商品,涵盖生活日用品、数码家电、美妆护肤等全品类,满足您多元化的生活需求。洽客商城,省钱省心,快乐购物每一天! 【限时补贴 省钱省心】 平台主打限时秒杀,定期更新超值爆款,低价抢购更畅快;搭配平台补贴,优惠券、满减活动叠加享受,购物更省钱。 【正品保障 活动多多】 我们严选知名品牌正品,保障品质与售后,同时深耕助农专区,直采源头好物,助力乡村振兴。不定期推出主题活动,如节日大促、9.9元抢购等,让您畅享购物乐趣。

Screenshots

星耀汇3 screens
洽客商城3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: 星耀汇 at none against 洽客商城's shown. 洽客商城's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.6). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 5 level
星耀汇 versus 洽客商城: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter星耀汇洽客商城
PriceFreeFree
Positive reviews—100.0% of reviews
Update frequency—Every 3 weeks
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.613.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size14 MB143 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperShenzhen Fanyin Yinghua Media Co.,LtdShenzhen Qiake E-Commerce Co., Ltd‌

In-app purchases

None

星耀汇

No in-app purchases

None

洽客商城

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 星耀汇 free?
星耀汇 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 洽客商城 free?
洽客商城 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do 星耀汇 or 洽客商城 have ads?
洽客商城 shows ads; 星耀汇 does not.

Other comparisons