Comparison

Flick vs AudioDock

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Flick

This app offers a minimalist resource management experience for WebDAV users. It allows direct access to your cloud storage without caching or tracking, providing a secure and uncluttered way to manage files on your mobile device.

Highlights
  • Minimalist resource management
  • Direct WebDAV access
  • No caching or tracking
  • Face ID security
  • Multiple path switching
  • Ad-free experience
Features
Read full description

Flick 是一款为 WebDAV 用户 打造的极简资源管理 App。 没有多余的装饰,没有冗杂的功能,也没有暗中的同步或追踪。 它只为一件事而存在—— 让你以最轻的方式,随时掌控自己的云端空间。 我们相信: 越简单,越强大。 一目了然的云端世界 像整理书架一样浏览与管理你的文件。 Flick 支持多个 WebDAV 路径,让你的云盘结构清晰可见。 每一次打开,都是一次与记忆的有序重逢。 即连即用,无痕体验 Flick 不缓存、不下载、不窥探。 它只是一个窗口,让你直接访问存放于云端的内容。 所有操作即时生效,不在本地留下任何痕迹。 你的数据,永远掌握在你自己手中。 安全守护,进入安心 Flick 支持 面容识别(Face ID), 为每一次访问增加一层安全防护。 无论是家庭共享还是私人存储, 你的入口,始终只属于你。 多路径切换,自由穿梭 从家庭 NAS 到私人网盘, Flick 能轻松连接、快速切换。 无论文件存放在哪里,你都能在同一个界面中自由穿行。 极简界面,为专注而生 没有广告,没有推荐,没有算法干预。 只有你与文件之间的纯粹交互。 在这个注意力稀缺的时代, Flick 选择安静——让你专注于内容与掌控本身。 我们为谁而做 使用 WebDAV,偏爱自建存储的你 希望数据只在云端,不愿被缓存的你 想在移动设备上轻量管理 NAS 资源的你 讨厌追踪、干扰与信息采集,只求安静使用的你 安全、私密、不打扰 我们承诺: 不存储你的内容 不上传任何信息 不追踪用户行为 不展示任何广告 Flick — 安静的力量 在纷繁的数字世界里, Flick 帮你保留一份不被打扰的自由。

About

AudioDock

This application allows for localized audio playback from a Network Attached Storage (NAS) device. It provides a convenient way to stream your personal audio library directly to your mobile devices.

Highlights
  • Localized audio playback
  • NAS device integration
  • Personal audio library streaming
  • Mobile device compatibility
Features
Read full description

NAS 本地化音频播放器

Screenshots

Flick4 screens
AudioDock4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Flick at 5.0 against AudioDock's 3.0. AudioDock's advantage is device support (3 vs 1) and iOS requirement (15.1 vs 17.0). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Flick holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Flick ships an update fortnightly, AudioDock weekly. The most recent releases landed on October 21, 2026 and October 25, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Flick versus AudioDock: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFlickAudioDock
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better3.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews—0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings11
Update frequencyFortnightlyWeekly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS17.015.1 — better
Further details — not scored
Size43 MB42 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer军 马Beijing Shengcang Technology Co., Ltd

Customer experience

Flick

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

AudioDock

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral100.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral100.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Flick

No in-app purchases

None

AudioDock

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Flick free?
Flick is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is AudioDock free?
AudioDock is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Flick or AudioDock?
Flick is rated higher. Flick averages 5.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while AudioDock averages 3.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Flick or AudioDock have ads?
Neither Flick nor AudioDock shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Flick or AudioDock?
Flick ships an update fortnightly, and AudioDock weekly. Most recently, Flick was updated on October 21, 2026 and AudioDock on October 25, 2026.

Other comparisons