Comparison

ETF智选 vs 量化速通

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

ETF智选

Features
Read full description

ETF智选是一款简单易懂的ETF手机应用,方便您随时随地查看对比ETF数据,研究ETF投资策略。 其核心功能包括: 1、ETF排行榜 展示不同主题、不同类型的ETF列表。 2、ETF计算器 简单的定投计算,相关性计算,ETF比较。 3、投资学院 学习ETF的基础知识和投研技巧。 4、模型策略 展示了一些官方示例的模型策略,方便学习研究。 5、策略开发 在APP上编写ETF单标的和多标的的定投策略、常规策略,还支持策略的历史回溯测试和发布。 另外,ETF计算器还支持黑色主题和白色主题,不同字体大小的设置。 —————————————————— 公众号:肥尾量化平台 邮箱:business@fat-tail.com

About

量化速通

Features
Read full description

想学量化投资却不懂编程?量化速通让你轻松上手!零基础体验经典策略,可视化回测股票表现。不连接券商、不实盘交易,纯粹的学习工具。每天10分钟,开启你的量化投资学习之旅!

Screenshots

ETF智选4 screens
量化速通4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: ETF智选 at 15.1 against 量化速通's 18.2. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. ETF智选 sells 6 one-off in-app purchases and 量化速通 sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

Scorecard1 real difference · 5 level
ETF智选 versus 量化速通: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterETF智选量化速通
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 2 days—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesYes
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS15.1 — better18.2
Further details — not scored
Size19 MB1 MB
Age rating17+17+
Developer治波 王桂珍 王

In-app purchases

6 purchases

ETF智选

One-time6
  • 6万算粒$2.99
  • 月度VIP-首充福利$2.99
  • 60万算粒$19.99
Show 3 more
  • 月度VIP$29.99
  • 180万算粒$49.99
  • 年度VIP$149.99
1 purchases

量化速通

One-time1
  • 终身会员$12.99

Questions

Is ETF智选 free?
ETF智选 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 量化速通 free?
量化速通 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do ETF智选 or 量化速通 have ads?
Neither ETF智选 nor 量化速通 shows ads.

Other comparisons