Comparison

Plabable OSCE Timer vs FROS OSCE Log

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Plabable OSCE Timer

This app simulates real exam conditions for PLAB 2 and PA OSCE exams. It features built-in timers for reading and examination phases, helping users stay focused and time-aware during practice sessions.

Highlights
  • Simulates real exam conditions
  • Built-in timers for reading phase
  • Built-in timers for examination phase
  • User-friendly interface
  • Supports solo and group practice
Features
Read full description

Practise PLAB 2 or PA OSCE exams with the Plabable OSCE Timer. Designed to simulate real exam conditions, this simple and user-friendly app includes built-in timers for both preparatory reading and examination phases. Whether you’re revising solo or practising in groups, the Plabable OSCE Timer helps you stay focused and time-aware. Use it alongside Plabable OSCE Gems and Plabable for PA OSCE Gems to help you ace the exams.

About

FROS OSCE Log

Features
Read full description

FROS Evidence Log is a purpose-built iPad application designed to support assessors delivering the FutureQuals First Responder on Scene (Level 3) Clinical Competence Examination (CCE). It replaces paper-based evidence logs with a secure, efficient, and standardised digital solution for recording assessment outcomes in real time. Assessors can quickly record candidate performance using structured evidence templates, ensuring consistent, accurate, and auditable assessment records. Key Features β€’ Digital Evidence Capture Record assessment outcomes against structured skill criteria aligned to FROS requirements. β€’ Candidate Number or Name Options Supports pseudonymised recording using candidate numbers only, with optional name capture if required. β€’ Automated Competency Decisions Clear Competent / Not Yet Competent outcomes based on recorded performance. β€’ Professional PDF Generation Generate clean, structured evidence reports for: β€’ Internal Quality Assurance (IQA) β€’ Learner copies β€’ Record keeping β€’ Secure Data Handling Designed for controlled device use within training departments. Data can be exported and removed after use. β€’ Learner & Evidence Management Manage multiple learners, filter records, and review assessment outcomes efficiently. β€’ Offline Use Fully functional without internet access. Designed For β€’ First Responder assessors β€’ Training centres delivering FROS qualifications β€’ Internal Quality Assurance processes

Screenshots

Plabable OSCE Timer4 screens
FROS OSCE Log4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: Plabable OSCE Timer at 15.1 against FROS OSCE Log's 17.6. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS

CostPrice Β· In-app purchases Β· Ads Β· Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference Β· 7 level
Plabable OSCE Timer versus FROS OSCE Log: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterPlabable OSCE TimerFROS OSCE Log
PriceFreeFree
Positive reviews100.0% of reviewsβ€”
Update frequencyEvery 7 monthsβ€”
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeβ€”
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod β€” betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS15.1 β€” better17.6
Further details β€” not scored
Size17 MB6 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperPlabable LimitedMichael D. Thompson

In-app purchases

None

Plabable OSCE Timer

No in-app purchases

None

FROS OSCE Log

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Plabable OSCE Timer free?
Plabable OSCE Timer is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is FROS OSCE Log free?
FROS OSCE Log is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Plabable OSCE Timer or FROS OSCE Log have ads?
Neither Plabable OSCE Timer nor FROS OSCE Log shows ads.

Other comparisons