TimerLog vs 心流时间
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
TimerLog
Read full descriptionHide full description
・Track time by tag ・Automatic backup (iCloud compatible) ・Keep screen on (disable screen sleep) ・Visualize records as graphs ・Export data as CSV ・Import CSV files to another device
心流时间
Read full descriptionHide full description
无广告,秒启动!拼图式自律,让坚持上瘾。将待办事项变成绝美拼图,为了看到拼图也会尽快完成待办啊~ 极简习惯养成器,终结拖延,收获看得见的成就。收集你的自律拼图,构建成就博物馆! 【拼图式打卡】:每完成一个目标,就解锁一块专属拼图。看着任务条被拼图填满,让坚持充满期待与惊喜。 【沉浸式专注】:内置极简计时器,为你隔离干扰,进入深度心流,高效搞定每一块拼图任务。 【决策之轮】:当选择困难时,让自定义转盘帮你快速决定,拯救纠结,立刻行动。 【成就博物馆】:所有已完成的拼图画作都在此珍藏,形成你独一无二的成就画廊,直观回顾成长轨迹。 【多维统计】:通过详尽的图表,量化分析你的专注时长、任务完成趋势与拼图收集成就。
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is iOS requirement: 心流时间 at 12.0 against TimerLog's 17.6. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | TimerLog | 心流时间 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 2 months | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 17.6 | 12.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 4 MB | 39 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Takada Hiroki | 北京动念智能科技有限公司 |
In-app purchases
TimerLog
No in-app purchases
心流时间
No in-app purchases









