Comparison

zHttpClient vs Katnet

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

zHttpClient

Features
Read full description

zHttpClient is a simple HTTP client built on libcurl. It lets you edit URL, headers, query parameters and body, then send the request and see the raw response.

About

Katnet

Read full description

katnet is a network discovery and connectivity toolkit for IT Professionals. See which hosts are online, which ports respond, and what each device advertises-then jump straight into SSH or VNC when you need a terminal or remote desktop. Discover devices Run a TCP sweep across your subnet (with a sensible default port set, or your own list). Results merge with Bonjour browsing and SSDP/UPnP-style hints so cameras, printers, NAS boxes, and servers show up with clearer context. Enrichment includes lightweight probes where appropriate (for example HTTP, TLS certificate summaries, SSH banners, and SNMP where reachable) to build a richer fingerprint-without sending your scan results to us. Built-in clients Use SSH for shell access and VNC for remote screen sharing to machines you are authorized to manage. A URL test tab helps verify HTTP/HTTPS reachability and status. A Status view summarizes local addressing and network context. Privacy katnet is built for on-network, on-device use. Discovery talks to your routers, printers, and servers over local Wi-Fi or Ethernet. You control when scanning runs. Grant Local Network access when iOS asks so multicast, Bonjour, and LAN probes can work. Important Only scan networks and systems you own or have explicit permission to test. Unauthorized scanning or access may violate law or policy.

Screenshots

zHttpClient4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is device support: zHttpClient at 2 against Katnet's β€”. zHttpClient also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 18.6). On price and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS

CostPrice Β· In-app purchases Β· Ads Β· Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences Β· 3 level
zHttpClient versus Katnet: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterzHttpClientKatnet
PriceFreeFree
AdsNoβ€”
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPod β€” betterβ€”
Requires iOS15.0 β€” better18.6
Further details β€” not scored
Size28 MB9 MB
Age rating17+4+
Developerθ΅·ε…΄ 韩IT GUY IO LLC

In-app purchases

None

zHttpClient

No in-app purchases

None

Katnet

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is zHttpClient free?
zHttpClient is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Katnet free?
Katnet is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons