Comparison

Gastroptim vs CoLo

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Gastroptim

Features
Read full description

Gastroptim optimise la gestion des comptes rendus et le suivi patient en gastroentérologie, grâce à une solution développée avec et pour les praticiens. Notre mission : faciliter le quotidien des praticiens, garantir des comptes rendus complets, standardisés et conformes aux recommandations officielles, tout en optimisant le suivi des patients. A votre disposition, un assistant qui vérifie en temps réel vos comptes rendus, propose des recommandations de suivi personnalisées, relie automatiquement les résultats anapath, et vous permet de gagner un temps précieux, en toute sécurité. Fonctionnalités principales : - Voici un aperçu des éléments disponibles dans votre outil Gastroptim : - Dictée assistée de comptes rendus de coloscopie, endoscopie et consultations. - Vérification automatique de la complétude et de la conformité aux guidelines. - Analyse croisée entre données endoscopiques, anatomopathologiques et recommandations scientifiques. - Génération instantanée de recommandations de suivi pour chaque patient. - Identitovigilance: Scan facile des étiquettes et intégration des résultats anapath. - Suivi des patients grâce à l’évolution des statuts, étape par étape. - Statistiques d’activité et de qualité, accessibles en réel et en un clic - Sécurité et confidentialité : hébergement HDS, conformité RGPD, contrôle des accès par rôle. - Support disponible tout au long de votre utilisation. Pourquoi choisir Gastroptim ? Jusqu’à 30 % de temps gagné sur la rédaction de chaque compte-rendu 100 % de conformité avec les recommandations en vigueur Centralisation et historique sécurisé de tous vos examens et suivis patients GastrOptim vous accompagne à chaque étape, pour que vous puissiez consacrer plus de temps à vos patients et moins à l’administratif.

About

CoLo

Features
Read full description

Over the past several years, it has been clearly demonstrated that patient management in colonoscopy can be optimized — both economically and environmentally — by refraining from systematically submitting all resected colonic polyps for histopathological examination, provided that these polyps meet specific visual and dimensional criteria. Despite this proven benefit and the publication of international recommendations by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE, 2014) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE, 2022), the practical implementation of selective histopathological analysis (Resect-and-Discard and Diagnose-and-Leave strategies) remains limited. This gap between recommendations and clinical practice is primarily due to the challenges associated with the training, certification, and objective evaluation of endoscopists’ ability to characterize polyps accurately. Furthermore, even with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), current systems still fall short of the reliability thresholds required by professional societies. Colo-ID has been developed to address these unmet needs. The application provides a comprehensive training and assessment platform designed for endoscopists. It includes a learning module and an interactive training environment that allow users to review a large number of annotated endoscopic images and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy, characterization skills, and therapeutic decision-making performance. Additionally, Colo-ID quantifies and displays the potential economic savings and carbon footprint reduction associated with the application of the Resect-and-Discard and Diagnose-and-Leave approaches. Finally, the platform also supports the creation and continuous enrichment of a structured database linking endoscopic image features with corresponding histopathological findings. This resource will contribute to the development and training of AI-based decision-support algorithms, with the long-term goal of improving the accuracy, safety, and sustainability of colorectal cancer prevention strategies.

Screenshots

Gastroptim4 screens
CoLo4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Gastroptim at every 3 weeks against CoLo's every 4 months. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Gastroptim ships an update every 3 weeks, CoLo every 4 months. The most recent releases landed on October 12, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 5 level
Gastroptim versus CoLo: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterGastroptimCoLo
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 4 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.1 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size34 MB48 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperIEROMEDAnamorphik Studio

In-app purchases

None

Gastroptim

No in-app purchases

None

CoLo

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Gastroptim free?
Gastroptim is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CoLo free?
CoLo is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Gastroptim or CoLo have ads?
Neither Gastroptim nor CoLo shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Gastroptim or CoLo?
Gastroptim ships an update every 3 weeks, and CoLo every 4 months. Most recently, Gastroptim was updated on October 12, 2026 and CoLo on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons