Comparison

ACC.26 vs JournalJams

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

ACC.26

Plan your medical conference experience with instant access to sessions, abstracts, exhibitors, and maps. Utilize an AI chatbot for personalized recommendations and engage with content through polls and Q&A.

Highlights
  • Session and abstract access
  • Exhibitor and map information
  • AI-powered recommendations
  • Itinerary building
  • Live session streaming
  • Audience response system
  • Attendee networking
Features
Read full description

The ACC.26 App is the key to planning your ACC.26 experience – get instant access to sessions, abstracts, exhibitors, maps and more! Plus, Artie, our AI chatbot, can provide personalized recommendations to help you navigate the meeting. Attendees can also: • Browse the program and build your perfect itinerary • Explore the Expo and Posters • Stream sessions and connect to the poster theater audio • Ask the experts your questions or participate in polls with the integrated audience response system • Connect with fellow attendees • Claim your credit

About

JournalJams

This app simplifies complex medical research for healthcare professionals. It provides concise summaries, key findings, study designs, and clinical significance of medical literature. It also offers discussion guides and contextual information to aid understanding and staying current.

Highlights
  • One-sentence study summaries
  • Key findings at a glance
  • Study design and methods breakdown
  • Clinical significance explained
  • Historical context and related trials
  • Limitations and bias analysis
  • Perspective-based discussion guides
Features
Read full description

JournalJams helps healthcare professionals quickly understand medical research. Enter a study name, specific keywords, or a research question, and get: • One-sentence study summaries • Key findings at a glance • Study design + methods breakdown • Clinical significance explained • Historical context (how it fits with prior research) • Limitations and bias • Discussion guides from every perspective (Med student, Resident, Fellow, Attg, PhD, Journal Editor, and Guidelines Committee) • Related landmark trials and closely connected studies Perfect for journal clubs, rounds prep, teaching, or staying current with the literature. For educational purposes only. Not intended to replace professional medical advice. Built by physicians, for physicians. Terms of Use (EULA): https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/ Privacy Policy: https://journaljams.org/privacy.html

Screenshots

ACC.264 screens
JournalJams4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: ACC.26 at none against JournalJams's 2. ACC.26 also leads on ratings volume (149 vs 4). JournalJams's advantage is rating (5.0 vs 4.6) and iOS requirement (15.1 vs 17.0). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. JournalJams sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $2.00 per month. ACC.26 asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

JournalJams holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.6. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: ACC.26 has 149 ratings behind it against 4, so its average is the more settled of the two.

Scorecard5 real differences · 4 level
ACC.26 versus JournalJams: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterACC.26JournalJams
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.6 (149 ratings)5.0 (4 ratings) — better
Number of ratings149 — better4
Update frequency—Every 9 days
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS17.015.1 — better
Further details — not scored
Size122 MB26 MB
Age rating12+17+
DeveloperAmerican College of CardiologyAnnas Rahman

Customer experience

ACC.26

All ratings149 ratings
Positive87.9%
Neutral4.0%
Negative8.1%

JournalJams

All ratings4 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

ACC.26

No in-app purchases

2 purchases

JournalJams

Subscriptions2
  • Pro Monthly$2.001 Month
  • Pro Annual$20.001 Year

Questions

Is ACC.26 free?
ACC.26 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is JournalJams free?
JournalJams is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, ACC.26 or JournalJams?
JournalJams is rated higher. ACC.26 averages 4.6 out of 5 from 149 ratings, while JournalJams averages 5.0 from 4 ratings.
Do ACC.26 or JournalJams have ads?
Neither ACC.26 nor JournalJams shows ads.

Other comparisons