AI vs Consensable
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β with what reviewers say about each.
AI
This app uses three leading AI models to debate your questions, critique each other's reasoning, and provide a synthesized recommendation. It offers structured deliberation for complex decisions, including specialized councils for general and investment-related queries.
- 3-round AI deliberation protocol
- Uses Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
- Anonymized cross-critique
- Chairman synthesis with confidence score
- Specialized Investment Council
- Decision history
- Available in 6 languages
Read full descriptionHide full description
Why trust one AI when three can debate it? AI-Consilium makes Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini independently analyze your question, critique each otherβs reasoning, and synthesize one clear recommendation β with confidence level, risks, and next steps. HOW IT WORKS AI-Consilium runs a structured 3-round deliberation for every question: Round 1 β Independent Analysis: Three AI advisors analyze your question from different perspectives. They cannot see each otherβs answers. Round 2 β Cross-Critique: Each AI receives the other responses (anonymized) and must steelman the strongest argument, challenge the weakest point, and revise their own position. Round 3 β Chairman Synthesis: A chairman AI synthesizes all viewpoints and critiques into one decisive recommendation with confidence score, risks, and a concrete next step. WHY ITβS DIFFERENT This isnβt a chatbot. Itβs a decision-making process. Other apps let you ask one AI or compare answers side-by-side. AI-Consilium forces three AIs to challenge each otherβs thinking β the same structured debate that real advisory boards and investment committees use. Anonymized responses prevent groupthink. The AIs critique arguments labeled X, Y, and Z β not βClaude saidβ or βGemini said.β Every critique is based on the quality of reasoning, not brand reputation. COUNCILS General Council β For any decision. Three perspectives: Strategic Thinker, Pragmatic Executor, and Contrarian Risk Analyst. Investment Council β For investment decisions. Perspectives: Fundamentalist, Macro-Strategist, and Risk Manager. Includes risk scorecard, scenario matrix, and tipping point analysis. FEATURES β’ 3-round deliberation protocol with real AI debate β’ Three leading AI models: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini β’ Anonymized cross-critique (anti-groupthink) β’ Chairman decision with confidence score and risks β’ Specialized Investment Council with financial analysis β’ Decision history β revisit past deliberations β’ Available in 6 languages β’ Privacy-first: deliberations stay on your device AI-Consilium does not provide financial advice. The Investment Council is a structured thinking framework that combines multiple AI perspectives to support your own decision-making. Free to use. Premium features coming soon.
Consensable
Read full descriptionHide full description
One AI can be wrong. One AI can be biased. One AI can be confidently mistaken β and you'd never know. Consensable fixes this by consulting GPT, Claude, Gemini and more in parallel, then synthesising their responses so you can see the full picture, not just one model's opinion. SIX MODES - Ask: Pose a question and get a synthesised answer combining perspectives from multiple AI models, with a consensus score and key claims ranked by how much the models agree - Dispatch: Send the same prompt to all models at once and compare their individual responses side by side - Write: Enter a title and multiple AI models research and collaborate to produce a full article with citations - Debate: Propose a statement and two AI models argue For and Against, with a third acting as judge - Review: Paste a piece of writing and multiple AI models give a structured peer review with strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations - Check: Paste a claim or article and AI models fact-check it, verifying key claims against available sources KEY FEATURES - Access to 300+ AI models including GPT, Claude, Gemini and more - Parallel queries in one tap β results synthesised automatically - Consensus score shows how much the models agree β and flags where they don't - Disputed claims are highlighted so you know exactly where uncertainty lies - Web search integration for real-time, grounded answers - Full history of your past queries - Push notifications when your synthesis is ready - Supports 75+ languages with automatic detection - Team and organisation plans for shared research Terms of Use (EULA): https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is in-app purchases: AI at none against Consensable's 6. Consensable's advantage is iOS requirement (15.1 vs 17.6). On price, ads and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Consensable sells 6 in-app purchases, starting at $5.99 per month. AI asks for nothing beyond the download.
| Parameter | AI | Consensable |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | β |
| Update frequency | β | Every 2 days |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No β better | Yes |
| Monetization | Free | β |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad | iPhone, iPad, iPod β better |
| Requires iOS | 17.6 | 15.1 β better |
| Further details β not scored | ||
| Size | 11 MB | 27 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Koen Verjans | WooSee Limited |
In-app purchases
AI
No in-app purchases
Consensable
- Plus Monthly$5.991 Month
- Pro Monthly$23.991 Month
- Plus Annual$59.991 Year
Show 1 moreShow fewer
- Pro Annual$239.991 Year
- 3,000 Credits$5.99
- 14,400 Credits$23.99









