KittyLitter vs Conductor.build
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
KittyLitter
This app provides a native mobile interface for interacting with Codex servers. It allows users to manage coding sessions remotely, review conversation history, and communicate with the AI using voice input, all without needing a laptop.
- Discover local Codex servers
- Connect to remote servers via SSH
- Voice input for AI prompts
- Review conversation history and code
- Mobile-native UI
- Stay connected to your own servers
Read full descriptionHide full description
Litter is a native mobile client for Codex. Connect to local or remote Codex servers, manage coding sessions from anywhere, and keep conversations moving without opening your laptop. Features: - Add a direct server endpoint, connect over SSH, or pair with Alleycat by QR code - Connect to remote machines over SSH and start Codex remotely - Talk to Codex with voice input for fast, hands-free prompts - Review conversation history, reasoning, code blocks, and images in a mobile-native UI - Keep coding sessions on servers you control, with optional Alleycat relay pairing and OpenAI voice processing Litter is open source and built for people who want their coding agent with them wherever they are.
Conductor.build
Manage a team of cloud-based coding agents directly from your Mac or phone. This tool allows for seamless control and operation of your development team from anywhere.
- Cloud-based coding agents
- Remote team management
- Mac and phone control
- Developer tool
Read full descriptionHide full description
Conductor lets you run a team of coding agents in the cloud and control them from your mac or phone.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is in-app purchases: Conductor.build at none against KittyLitter's 4. Conductor.build also leads on chart position (#80 vs unranked). KittyLitter's advantage is review sentiment (100% vs 89%) and ratings volume (45 vs 11). On price, rating, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. KittyLitter sells 4 one-off in-app purchases. Conductor.build asks for nothing beyond the download.
On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 4.8 for KittyLitter against 4.8 for Conductor.build. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 45 and 11 respectively. Written reviews are what separate them: 100% of KittyLitter's written reviews are positive against 89% of Conductor.build's.
KittyLitter ships an update weekly, Conductor.build every 4 days. Both last shipped on October 25, 2026.
| Parameter | KittyLitter | Conductor.build |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.8 (45 ratings) — better | 4.8 (11 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better | 88.9% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 45 — better | 11 |
| Update frequency | Weekly | Every 4 days — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | Yes | No — better |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Best chart rank | — | #80 — better |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch — better | iPhone |
| Requires iOS | 18.0 — better | 26.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 150 MB | 77 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | sherif cherfa | Melty, Inc. |
Customer experience
KittyLitter
Conductor.build
In-app purchases
KittyLitter
- $9.99 Tip$9.99
- $24.99 Tip$24.99
- $49.99 Tip$49.99
Show 1 moreShow fewer
- $99.99 Tip$99.99
Conductor.build
No in-app purchases
