Table Cycle Timer vs RecurringTimer
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β with what reviewers say about each.
Table Cycle Timer
Read full descriptionHide full description
Table Cycle Timer is a refined multi-timer designed for precise, uninterrupted workflow management. Control up to 30 timers simultaneously, with seamless repeat cycles and fixed intervals that keep recurring tasks perfectly in sync. A clean, highly legible interface ensures that remaining time is always clear at a glance, even in fast-paced environments. Optimized for both iPhone and iPad, it works beautifully as a shared display on counters and workstations. Use cases: β’ Service timing and task cycles β’ Order checks and routine tasks β’ Any repeated time-based workflow Features β’ Manage up to 30 timers β’ Set default for all timers β’ Alerts & alarms β’ Repeat timers (fixed intervals) β’ Adjust running timers β’ Track number of cycles β’ One-tap start & reset β’ iPhone & iPad optimized β’ Clean, intuitive UI Designed for clarity, precision, and flow. A simple, elegant solution for managing timeβrepeatedly, reliably.
RecurringTimer
Read full descriptionHide full description
ecurring Timer lets you set a time interval that repeats automatically β no tapping required between cycles. Set your interval, tap Start, and the app beeps and/or vibrates at every boundary, looping indefinitely until you tap Stop. Works in the background with the screen off. Perfect for: - Interval training and workouts - Meditation and breathing exercises - Practice sessions with timed rounds - Any activity that needs a repeating rhythm **Features** - Single interval input in seconds or minutes - Sound alert, vibration, or both β your choice - Visual countdown with progress ring - Cycle counter tracks how many intervals have completed - Save and reload your favourite configurations as presets - No notifications, no popups β just a clean alert and back to counting
Screenshots
Verdict
Table Cycle Timer and RecurringTimer are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters β price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them β neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Table Cycle Timer | RecurringTimer |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Update frequency | Every 3 weeks | β |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod β better | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 15.1 β better | 16.0 |
| Further details β not scored | ||
| Size | 26 MB | 1 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Rui Otake | Abu Marcose |
In-app purchases
Table Cycle Timer
No in-app purchases
RecurringTimer
No in-app purchases





