Comparison

Cello vs Decubed

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Cello

Discover the full potential of AI assistants like ChatGPT and Gemini with daily, practical prompts. Explore guided journeys to deepen your understanding and easily integrate AI into your workflow.

Highlights
  • Daily bite-sized AI prompts
  • Guided learning journeys
  • Easy copy-paste functionality
  • Maximizes AI tool potential
  • Practical AI integration
Features
Read full description

Start using AI. One prompt at a time. Most of us are barely scratching the surface of what ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini can do — simply because we don't know what to ask. Cello changes that. Get one bite-sized, brilliantly practical prompt delivered every morning — plus journeys to go deeper. Copy, paste, go.

About

Decubed

Read full description

Decubed is the local-first AI workspace for the models, tools, memory, and agent workflows you choose. Most AI apps start with one model. Decubed starts with your environment. It gives you one place to connect model providers, work with local or remote model paths, keep durable threads, manage memories, and control which tools an agent can use. Use Decubed to: - Bring local, remote, linked-account, and custom models into one workspace. - Keep threads, folders, memory, tools, approvals, and run history attached to your environment. - Approve sensitive tool actions before they run. - Inspect tool calls, waiting states, and completed runs in the thread. - Configure agents around jobs with their own model, prompt, tools, skills, and memory policy. Decubed is designed for people who want model choice without giving up context or control. Run supported models on device when work should stay close to you, or connect hosted providers when a task needs remote capability. Bring the model. Keep the control.

Screenshots

Cello4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is device support: Cello at 2 against Decubed's —. On price, in-app purchases and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
Cello versus Decubed: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCelloDecubed
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (6 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings6 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 6 weeks—
AdsNo—
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPod — better—
Requires iOS15.115.1
Further details — not scored
Size87 MB37 MB
Age rating4+12+
DeveloperCandice BryantLOGICAL ADVANCED BRAINS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMPANY

In-app purchases

None

Cello

No in-app purchases

None

Decubed

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Cello free?
Cello is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Decubed free?
Decubed is free to download, with no in-app purchases.

Other comparisons