Comparison

FocusFlow vs Frequency Loom

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side β€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

FocusFlow

Features
Read full description

Struggle to stay focused while studying? FocusFlow is a simple ADHD-friendly focus timer that helps you stay locked in, avoid distractions, and finish your study sessions without switching apps. FocusFlow is designed specifically for students with ADHD and anyone who finds it hard to stay focused. No complicated features. No distractions. Just pure focus. Stay in the zone, complete your tasks, and build a consistent study habitβ€”one session at a time. Key Features: 1. Clean, distraction-free focus timer 2. Designed for ADHD brains 3. Helps reduce app switching 4. Stay locked into study sessions 5. Track your focus progress 6. Minimal, calming interface Why You’ll Love It: 1. Feel less overwhelmed 2.Build real focus habits 3.Get more done in less time Download FocusFlow today and take back control of your focus.

About

Frequency Loom

Features
Read full description

See what changed at a position Change Desk compares two intact sealed acoustic runs at the same planned position. Rank band-level changes and share a report linked to the exact stored evidence. β€’ Open a commissioning project β†’ Verify β†’ Change Desk. β€’ Choose baseline and later runs at the same planned position. Confirm comparable stimulus level, gain, microphone position and room conditions. β€’ Compare broadband and matching-band changes, then share the frozen evidence references. Both runs must be accepted, nonvoided and seal-valid, with matching input chain, route, sample rate, scale, stimulus and band set. Matching metadata cannot prove matching physical conditions. Differences are not a transfer function, EQ recommendation or proof of improvement. Frequency Loom is an acoustic commissioning fieldbook for installed sound systems. It turns a listener-area plan into a traceable record of positions, witnessed microphone runs, acceptance results, and handoff evidence. Start with the job, not a generic meter. Record the site, room, work order, operator, client witness, installed system, microphone, interface, channel, and field calibration context. Lay out one or more listener areas with named measurement positions, microphone heights, plan coordinates, notes, and required repeat counts. At each position, capture a live evidence run while the installed sound system or another external source plays pink noise, speech-shaped noise, program material, or a sweep; use Ambient only for background capture. Frequency Loom records broadband RMS, one-third-octave band values, active input route, sample rate, captured duration, clipping, and level stability. Short, clipped, unstable, incomplete, interrupted, or route-changing runs are held out of verification instead of being silently treated as valid. The acceptance matrix evaluates project-defined targets for: - Planned position coverage - Listener-area level spread - Worst cross-position band spread - Repeat-run agreement - Optional referenced ambient and commissioned-level limits Every retained run receives a deterministic SHA-256 evidence seal. Later changes cause an integrity mismatch and exclude the run. Voided runs stay visible as ledger events. Export the complete job as structured JSON, CSV, or a readable commissioning report through the iOS share sheet. The commissioning workflow requires no account or developer network service and works offline; Methodology links open external reference websites only when you tap them. Microphone samples are analyzed on device and are not saved as audio. Projects remain in private local storage until you deliberately export them. There are no analytics, ads, tracking SDKs, remote flags, or subscriptions. Uncalibrated work is labeled relative dBFS. A documented reference match can produce referenced dB SPL values, but Frequency Loom does not claim that an iPhone, microphone, calibrator, or input chain conforms to IEC, ISO, ANSI, or AVIXA standards. The app is a commissioning evidence fieldbook, not a class-rated sound level meter or standards certificate.

Screenshots

FocusFlow4 screens
Frequency Loom3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: FocusFlow at Free against Frequency Loom's $3.99. On ads, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price Β· Rating Β· Positive reviews Β· Number of ratings Β· Update frequency Β· Ads Β· In-app purchases Β· Monetization Β· Best chart rank Β· Devices Β· Requires iOS

CostPrice Β· In-app purchases Β· Ads Β· Monetization

FocusFlow is free to download; Frequency Loom costs $3.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference Β· 5 level
FocusFlow versus Frequency Loom: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFocusFlowFrequency Loom
PriceFree β€” better$3.99
Update frequencyβ€”Every 4 days
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS18.617.0 β€” better
Further details β€” not scored
Size1 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperKELVIN SENANU WALLACERobert Corbin

In-app purchases

None

FocusFlow

No in-app purchases

None

Frequency Loom

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is FocusFlow free?
FocusFlow is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Frequency Loom free?
Frequency Loom costs $3.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do FocusFlow or Frequency Loom have ads?
Neither FocusFlow nor Frequency Loom shows ads.

Other comparisons