自动精灵 vs 自动精灵
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
自动精灵
This tool automates repetitive screen taps for increased efficiency. It's ideal for gamers and users in high-frequency clicking scenarios, offering customizable parameters and a simple interface to free up your hands.
- Automated screen tapping
- High-speed clicking
- Customizable parameters
- One-click automation
- User-friendly interface
- Supports gaming and repetitive tasks
Read full descriptionHide full description
主打自动点击、高速连点的高效工具，一键模拟屏幕连续点击，彻底替代枯燥重复手动操作，大幅提升操作效率，游戏玩家、高频点击场景用户必备。 可视化简易界面，零基础快速上手，自由自定义全套连点参数，一键启动自动化任务，省心解放双手。 游戏高速连击、页面反复触发、抢购刷新等场景全能适配，省时省力，告别手动反复点按。
自动精灵
Read full descriptionHide full description
智能自动连点工具，辅助功能解放双手高效使用。
Screenshots
Verdict
自动精灵 and 自动精灵 are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters — price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | 自动精灵 | 自动精灵 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.9 (8 ratings) — better | — |
| Number of ratings | 8 — better | — |
| Update frequency | Every 10 days | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 — better | 15.6 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 53 MB | 21 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | 至浩 刘 | 易之 张 |
In-app purchases
自动精灵
No in-app purchases
自动精灵
No in-app purchases
