Comparison

Pittaly vs RICOH IWB Client

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Pittaly

This application allows users to collect and upload data to a cloud service. It supports various methods for scanning EAN-13 codes, including hardware cameras and Bluetooth scanners. Users can also sync master data, download scanned results in CSV format, and manage frequently used products.

Highlights
  • EAN-13 code scanning
  • Hardware camera support
  • Bluetooth barcode scanner
  • ScanJacket integration
  • Data correction
  • Master data sync
  • CSV data export
Features
Read full description

This app can collect some kind data and user can upload this data to Pittaly Cloud Service. When getting EAN-13 code in this app, this app can use ScanJacket or Hardware Camera. Feature 1. When getting EAN-13 code, this app supports Hardware Camera. 2. When getting EAN-13 code, this app supports Bluetooth Barcode Scanner. 3. When getting EAN-13 code, this app supports ScanJacket by SANEI ERECTRIC Inc.. 4. Until results uploaded, it can correct results what you made. Optional 1. It can sync master data of Product, Shop and Staff. 2. When results uploaded, it can download this data with CSV format. 3. It can send mail appended results with CSV format. 4. It can use the ability to My List list of products frequently used and product classification. On Pittaly Cloud Service, you can do below. 1. upload master data 2. download data scaned with Pittaly App 3. register devices installed Pittaly App

About

RICOH IWB Client

Connect your device to a RICOH Interactive Whiteboard to view its screen, draw, add pages, and control inputs. This app enhances collaboration and discussion in business settings.

Highlights
  • View whiteboard screen
  • Draw strokes and markers
  • Delete strokes
  • Add and turn pages
  • Switch external inputs
  • Upload image files
Features
Read full description

RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Client can enforce your discussion more interactively by connecting your device to RICOH Interactive Whiteboard via local network. ※To use RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Client, RICOH Interactive Whiteboard (http://www.ricoh.co.jp/iwb/) and the license for remote whiteboard function are required. ■Features available ・View screen of RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・Draw strokes on the screen of RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・Draw markers on RICOH Interactive Whiteboard (drawn marker automatically disappears in a few seconds after it is drawn) ・Delete strokes on RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・Add new pages on RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・Turn pages of RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・Switch external inputs of RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・Upload image file to RICOH interactive whiteboard ■How to use 1. Start a RICOH Interactive Whiteboard, and start a Remote Whiteboard session 2. Run the RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Client 3. Input IP Address or host name of the RICOH Interactive Whiteboard and the passcode displayed on the RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ■Supported OS Please refer to the list of supported OS from the linked "Notes for Users". http://support.ricoh.com/bb_v1oi/html/oi/r/model/op10/op10en.htm ■Connectable RICOH Interactive Whiteboard ・D5510 (firmware version 1.6 and later) ・D2200 ・RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Controller Type 1 ・RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Controller Type 2 ・RICOH Collaboration Board Controller Type 3 ・RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Controller OP-5/OP-10 (with RICOH Interactive Whiteboard Lt for Open Controller)

Screenshots

Pittaly3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is device support: Pittaly at 3 against RICOH IWB Client's 1. RICOH IWB Client's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.6). On price, rating, ratings volume and update cadence there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Pittaly against 5.0 for RICOH IWB Client. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Pittaly ships an update every 3 months, RICOH IWB Client every 6 months. The most recent releases landed on November 1, 2026 and November 5, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
Pittaly versus RICOH IWB Client: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterPittalyRICOH IWB Client
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews33.3% of reviews—
Number of ratings11
Update frequencyEvery 3 months — betterEvery 6 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPad
Requires iOS15.613.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size31 MB13 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperUSAC SYSTEM CO.,LTD.Ricoh Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

Pittaly

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral33.3%
Negative33.3%

RICOH IWB Client

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Pittaly

No in-app purchases

None

RICOH IWB Client

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Pittaly free?
Pittaly is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is RICOH IWB Client free?
RICOH IWB Client is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Pittaly or RICOH IWB Client?
Pittaly and RICOH IWB Client are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 1 and 1 ratings respectively.
Do Pittaly or RICOH IWB Client have ads?
Neither Pittaly nor RICOH IWB Client shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Pittaly or RICOH IWB Client?
Pittaly ships an update every 3 months, and RICOH IWB Client every 6 months. Most recently, Pittaly was updated on November 1, 2026 and RICOH IWB Client on November 5, 2026.

Other comparisons