Comparison

Thrombosis vs OSCEr

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Thrombosis

Provides healthcare professionals with up-to-date clinical tools and practice guidelines for managing thrombosis. Access interactive diagnostic aids, comprehensive treatment guides, and patient education materials.

Highlights
  • Interactive clinical tools
  • Comprehensive clinical guides
  • Patient education resources
  • User-friendly interface
  • Regular updates
  • Offline access
Features
Read full description

The Thrombosis Canada mobile app is your on-the-go resource for up-to-date clinical tools and practice guidelines related to thrombosis management. Built for healthcare professionals, this app offers quick access to: - Clinical Tools: Interactive tools designed to help with diagnosis, treatment, and risk assessment in managing patients with thrombosis. - Clinical Guides: Comprehensive guidelines from Thrombosis Canada covering various thrombosis conditions, treatments, and best practices. - Patient Resources: A wide range of materials including documents and videos, that can be shared with patients to educate them. Key Features: Whether you’re in the clinic, hospital, or consulting remotely, the Thrombosis Canada app ensures you have critical information at your fingertips. - User-Friendly Interface: Navigate easily through tools and guidelines with a simple and intuitive layout. Designed to be robust, yet concise enough to be applicable at the point of care. - Regular Updates: Always stay current with the latest guidelines and evidence-based practices. - Offline Access: Use clinical guides even without an internet connection. - Tailored for Healthcare Professionals: Developed voluntarily by Thrombosis CanadaTM members, internationally recognized as experts and peer reviewed by Thrombosis Canada committee. - Credibility: Reviewed for applicability to primary care by members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada and these were not supported financially by any external funders.

About

OSCEr

This app helps medical students practice clinical skills and prepare for OSCE exams. It offers timed tests, practice modes with hints, and detailed progress tracking for various body systems and assessments.

Highlights
  • Self-paced clinical skills learning
  • OSCE practice with timed tests
  • Checklists for history-taking and physical exams
  • Progress tracking by body system
  • Customizable test options (hints, timed)
  • Detailed performance breakdown
Features
Read full description

OSCEr (OSCE-review) is a freely-accessible, self-paced app made for medical students – by students – to help learn clinical skills and practice for OSCEs. This comprehensive app integrates diverse resources (like the Essentials of Clinical Examination Handbook and clinicalskillstoronto.com) and features checklists to practice history-taking, physical exams, or combined history and physicals – all while keeping track of progress. Users can focus on a body-system of interest, within which they can choose a specific assessment to either practice or test themselves under timed conditions (OSCE style), with or without hints or explanations. As each exam is completed, areas of competency and those needing further practice are highlighted, enabling a targeted approach to study and helping to make learning clinical skills both more efficient and enjoyable. Instructions: 1. Find an exam: • Select an organ from the main page (e.g. Neurology), use the search-bar to find an exam directly or use the ‘Quick Test’ button to do a random test. • If an organ-system is chosen, see all exam checklists belonging to that category. • If attempted before in ‘test’ mode, a progress-bar is shown next to the exam name with the average score achieved over all attempts. 2. Customize test/practice options: • Select a checklist (e.g. Headache) to see options before practicing/testing • Choose whether to be in test-mode (timed/scored vs. practice-mode) or show hints (explanations for each point). • Choose to do a history, physical, or combined history/physical checklist depending on the exam. • See details about previous test attempts, including number of attempts, score of last attempt, and average score of all attempts. • Select ‘Detailed Progress’ to see a point-by-point breakdown of previous attempts and a list of scores/times of all attempts. 3. Practice/Test an exam: • Choose ‘Start Test or Practice’ to begin the test/practice checklist • For each point (e.g. ‘Patient’s general appearance’) select done correctly (solid circle), with omissions (half circle) or incomplete (empty circle). • Once finished, score and time data are saved for progress tracking and later review. Acknowledgements: App Design Team: • Team Leader: Arjun Balachandar • Programmers: Ahmad Alhashemi (iOS), Zubair Baig (Android) • Designers: Matan Berson, Sonia Seto • Content Development: Adrian Cozma, Kota Talla ECEH Executive Team: • Yuhao Shi, Brandon Tang, Zahra Sohani, Florentina Teoderascu Checklist authors – Clinical Skills Toronto: • Adrian Cozma (checklist leader), Mathew Patenaude, Josephine DAbbondanza, Arti Dhoot, Emily Patterson, Preeni Rathuge, Fady Sedarous, Erene Stergiopoulos, Kazim Giby, Cecilia Alvarez-Veronesi, Ahmed Zaki, Joel Gupta, Groonie Tang

Screenshots

Thrombosis4 screens
OSCEr4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: OSCEr at 5.0 against Thrombosis's 4.0. OSCEr also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 75%) and iOS requirement (10.0 vs 12.0). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

OSCEr holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 2 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 75% of Thrombosis's written reviews are positive against 100% of OSCEr's.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Thrombosis versus OSCEr: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterThrombosisOSCEr
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (3 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews75.0% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings3 — better2
Update frequencyEvery 5 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS12.010.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size36 MB36 MB
Age rating12+17+
DeveloperThrombosis CanadaAhmad Alhashemi

Customer experience

Thrombosis

All ratings3 ratings
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive75.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative25.0%

OSCEr

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Thrombosis

No in-app purchases

None

OSCEr

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Thrombosis free?
Thrombosis is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is OSCEr free?
OSCEr is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Thrombosis or OSCEr?
OSCEr is rated higher. Thrombosis averages 4.0 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while OSCEr averages 5.0 from 2 ratings.
Do Thrombosis or OSCEr have ads?
Neither Thrombosis nor OSCEr shows ads.

Other comparisons