Comparison

北京地铁 vs 青城地铁

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

北京地铁

This app provides comprehensive services for Beijing subway travel, including ticket scanning, route planning, and fare inquiries. It also offers operational support like lost and found, and convenience services such as dining and shopping along the subway lines.

Highlights
  • Scan code for travel
  • Route planning
  • Fare inquiry
  • Lost and found
  • Volunteer services
  • Local dining and shopping
Features
Read full description

北京地铁APP,一站式解决地铁出行全需求! · 核心出行服务:支持刷码乘车、线路规划、票价查询,高效省心。 · 运营保障服务:支持爱心预约、失物招领、延误证明,出行无忧。 · 便民生活服务:覆盖轨道沿线吃喝玩乐购,支持网订站取,打造全时程出行新体验。 · 志愿者专属页:优化北京平安地铁志愿者功能,方便志愿者参与地铁志愿服务。

About

青城地铁

This app offers convenient public transit payment options for city commuters, including QR code and facial recognition boarding. It eliminates the need for cash or physical cards, making travel faster and simpler for residents and visitors alike.

Highlights
  • QR code boarding
  • Facial recognition boarding
  • Non-cash ticket purchase
  • Credit payment
  • Eliminates cash and deposits
  • Real-time travel information
Features
Read full description

青城地铁App专注城市交通出行,为呼市百万乘客提供了便捷的扫码、刷脸乘车功能和非现金购票功能,是每一位乘客的出行生活神器。 有了青城地铁App,从此告别现金、押金、充值与找零,也告别了排队、丢卡、问路和百度,不管您是长期在这里生活,还是临时在此出差旅行,青城地铁App,您值得拥有! 青城地铁手机乘车,让您出行快人一步!打开青城地铁,点击“二维码”按钮,对准闸机的扫描区轻松一扫,秒速识别,方便快捷。点击“开通刷脸乘车”按钮,到达闸机前脸部正面对准人脸识别设备,快速识别,无感乘车。先乘车,后付费,无需担心余额,想怎么坐,就怎么坐,信用支付,实惠省心。 交通领域的互联网时代现已开启,青城地铁App,为您提供更方便、快捷、人性化的公共交通互联网票务服务。

Screenshots

北京地铁4 screens
青城地铁4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 北京地铁 at 1.6 against 青城地铁's 1.0. 北京地铁 also leads on ads (none vs shown) and monetization model (free vs ad-supported). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

北京地铁 holds the better App Store score, 1.6 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 13 and 3 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 10% of 北京地铁's written reviews are positive against 0% of 青城地铁's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on August 25, 2026 and September 9, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
北京地铁 versus 青城地铁: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter北京地铁青城地铁
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.6 (13 ratings) — better1.0 (3 ratings)
Positive reviews10.0% of reviews — better0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings13 — better3
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 2 months
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree — betterAd-supported
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS9.0 — better15.6
Further details — not scored
Size193 MB159 MB
Age rating17+4+
Developer北京地铁呼和浩特地铁科技发展有限公司

Customer experience

北京地铁

All ratings13 ratings
Positive15.4%
Neutral0.0%
Negative84.6%
Written reviews10 reviews
Positive10.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative90.0%

青城地铁

All ratings3 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

北京地铁

No in-app purchases

None

青城地铁

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 北京地铁 free?
北京地铁 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 青城地铁 free?
青城地铁 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 北京地铁 or 青城地铁?
北京地铁 is rated higher. 北京地铁 averages 1.6 out of 5 from 13 ratings, while 青城地铁 averages 1.0 from 3 ratings.
Do 北京地铁 or 青城地铁 have ads?
青城地铁 shows ads; 北京地铁 does not.
Which is updated more often, 北京地铁 or 青城地铁?
北京地铁 ships an update every 2 months, and 青城地铁 every 2 months. Most recently, 北京地铁 was updated on August 25, 2026 and 青城地铁 on September 9, 2026.

Other comparisons