Run.M vs バナー筋トレタイマー
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Run.M
This app uses Google Maps to calculate distances by simply tapping on the map. It's recommended for activities like running and cycling.
- Google Maps integration
- Tap-to-calculate distance
- Recommended for running
- Recommended for cycling
- Distance display
Read full descriptionHide full description
googlemapを利用した、距離計算アプリケーションです。 マップをタップしていく事で、距離が計算され表示されます。 ランニングや、サイクリングの時、ご利用をおすすめします。 The distance calculation application for which googlemap was used. At a running and a cycling, I'll recommend you use. ※googlemapは米国google社の商標です。
バナー筋トレタイマー
Read full descriptionHide full description
ジムで筋トレするときに、タイマーの音が気になる... イヤホンをしていると、タイマーの音が大きすぎる... 音楽を邪魔せずに時間を測りたい... という人に向けた新しい筋トレタイマーアプリです！ 今後機能をドンドン追加していく予定です！
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ads: バナー筋トレタイマー at none against Run.M's shown. バナー筋トレタイマー also leads on iOS requirement (16.0 vs 18.0). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Run.M | バナー筋トレタイマー |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Positive reviews | 61.8% of reviews | — |
| Update frequency | Every 4 months | — |
| Ads | Yes | No — better |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Ad-supported | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad — better | iPhone |
| Requires iOS | 18.0 | 16.0 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 22 MB | 0 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | nao honda | Kazuki Uchiyama |
In-app purchases
Run.M
No in-app purchases
バナー筋トレタイマー
No in-app purchases
