Comparison

ChatUWM vs Arbor Financial Group

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

ChatUWM

This app empowers independent mortgage brokers to manage their business remotely. It provides tools to view loan pipelines, lock loans, check rates, and submit conditions. Brokers can also access UWM's EASE platform, utilize chat support, and manage client requests.

Highlights
  • Loan pipeline management
  • Loan locking and submission
  • Rate checking
  • Scenario creation
  • Chat support
  • Document access
  • Home value estimation
Features
Read full description

ChatUWM By United Wholesale Mortgage, LLC Created exclusively to help independent mortgage brokers manage their business on the go. Get quick access to ChatUWM, UWM’s AI-powered tool featured front and center in the ChatUWM mobile app. From one convenient app, brokers can ask questions, manage their pipeline, price loans, take lock actions, estimate home values, view their EASE Dashboard, stay on top of daily tasks and much more.

About

Arbor Financial Group

Track your loan progress, receive real-time updates, and submit necessary conditions directly from your mobile device. Stay informed about important dates and communicate seamlessly with your loan team from origination to closing.

Highlights
  • Loan tracking
  • Real-time updates
  • Condition submission
  • Loan information verification
  • Push notification reminders
  • In-app chat
Features
Read full description

The Arbor Financial Group mobile app allows consumers, real estate agents, and loan officers the ability to track their loan, receive real-time updates and submit conditions via their mobile device. Users are able to verify loan information and status, receive push notification reminders for important dates (appraisal, loan commitment, closing, rate lock, etc.), initiate a chat and remain engaged from origination to close.

Screenshots

ChatUWM4 screens
Arbor Financial Group4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: Arbor Financial Group at 100% against ChatUWM's 41%. Arbor Financial Group also leads on rating (5.0 vs 3.8) and iOS requirement (10.0 vs 16.0). ChatUWM's advantage is ratings volume (182 vs 26). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Arbor Financial Group holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: ChatUWM has 182 ratings behind it against 26, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 41% of ChatUWM's written reviews are positive against 100% of Arbor Financial Group's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

ChatUWM ships an update fortnightly, Arbor Financial Group every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 29, 2026 and October 23, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
ChatUWM versus Arbor Financial Group: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterChatUWMArbor Financial Group
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.8 (182 ratings)5.0 (26 ratings) — better
Positive reviews41.4% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings182 — better26
Update frequencyFortnightlyEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS16.010.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size105 MB28 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperUWMTHE TURNKEY FOUNDATION INC

Customer experience

ChatUWM

All ratings182 ratings
Positive69.2%
Neutral3.8%
Negative26.9%
Written reviews58 reviews
Positive41.4%
Neutral3.4%
Negative55.2%

Arbor Financial Group

All ratings26 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Bugs and requests

ChatUWM

Reported bugs

15 issues
  • CR does not work
  • App doesn't find account
  • App keeps crashing
  • App always logs you out
  • App never saves logins
Show 10 more
  • Cannot login to the app
  • Incorrect password error
  • User ID and password not accepted
  • App pulls up wrong documents
  • Cannot log in after multiple updates
  • Login issues (incorrect username/password)
  • App not working on iOS
  • App not working on mobile devices
  • Mobile website is slow and choppy
  • Cannot access information without a computer

Requested features

11 requests
  • App for homeowners/customers
  • Customer-facing app for payments and loan activity
  • Ability to manage mortgage payments
  • Ability to schedule loan payments
  • User-friendly interface for consumers
Show 6 more
  • Update mobile website for user-friendliness
  • Integrate customer option into the app
  • Facial recognition login
  • Allow selection of payment withdrawal date
  • Change fees in the app
  • Fix document viewing errors

Arbor Financial Group

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

ChatUWM

No in-app purchases

None

Arbor Financial Group

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is ChatUWM free?
ChatUWM is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Arbor Financial Group free?
Arbor Financial Group is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, ChatUWM or Arbor Financial Group?
Arbor Financial Group is rated higher. ChatUWM averages 3.8 out of 5 from 182 ratings, while Arbor Financial Group averages 5.0 from 26 ratings.
Do ChatUWM or Arbor Financial Group have ads?
Neither ChatUWM nor Arbor Financial Group shows ads.
Which is updated more often, ChatUWM or Arbor Financial Group?
ChatUWM ships an update fortnightly, and Arbor Financial Group every 2 weeks. Most recently, ChatUWM was updated on October 29, 2026 and Arbor Financial Group on October 23, 2026.

Other comparisons