Comparison

Spriv Authenticator vs URLtoQR extension

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Spriv Authenticator

This app streamlines two-factor authentication with a patented one-click approval system. It offers automated authentication in under a second, reducing login hassle. Traditional TOTP, SMS, and Allow/Deny methods are also supported.

Highlights
  • One-click authentication
  • Automated 2FA
  • Fast authentication (<1 second)
  • Supports TOTP, SMS, Allow/Deny
  • Company and administrator focused
Features
Read full description

What makes Spriv so cool? Only one single click on “Allow” and all future logins from the same computer will automatically be allowed without any user intervention, as long as the phone is near the same computer. In most cases Spriv will automatically authenticate the second channel in Two Factor Authentication seamlessly and in less than one second! With Spriv’s automated, patented, and patent pending technology there is no more hassle from constant interaction with your phone every time you login. Simply enter your username/password and Spriv will authenticate seamlessly, and in most cases in less than a second! In addition to an automated 2FA platform, Spriv also provides traditional TOTP, SMS and Allow | Deny. Spriv is free for 10 users, no credit card is required, and the registration process is simple and quick. in order to create a free account please go to www.spriv.com and click on Sign-Up Please contact Spriv support with any question you may have at support@spriv.com Note: Spriv is a Two Factor Authentication platform for companies and system administrators to secure access to websites and services such as RDP, SSH, Wordpress etc'

About

URLtoQR extension

Easily create QR codes for the websites you're currently browsing. This tool offers a straightforward way to share links via QR codes without any intrusive tracking.

Highlights
  • Generate QR codes for current websites
  • Safari extension integration
  • No tracking or analytics
  • Direct in-app support
Features
Read full description

URLtoQR turns the Safari page you're on into a QR code, so you can open it on another device or share it without typing the link. It works right inside Safari, with no app to switch to and nothing to paste. Point any phone camera at the code and the page opens. Move an article from your Mac to your iPhone, or share a link with the people around you. • Instant QR code — open URLtoQR from Safari's toolbar or extensions menu and the code is already there • Save or send — long-press or right-click the code to save, copy or share it • Guided setup — the app shows where to turn URLtoQR on and let it work on the sites you visit • Works offline — codes are made without a connection, account or sign-in • Everywhere you use Safari — iPhone, iPad, Mac and Apple Vision Pro URLtoQR is free and collects no data. The link is never sent to a server, and there are no ads, trackers or in-app purchases. Privacy Policy: https://urltoqr.app/privacy Terms of Use: https://urltoqr.app/terms

Screenshots

Spriv Authenticator4 screens
URLtoQR extension2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: URLtoQR extension at 100% against Spriv Authenticator's 33%. URLtoQR extension also leads on rating (5.0 vs 3.0) and device support (4 vs 1). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

URLtoQR extension holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 4 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 33% of Spriv Authenticator's written reviews are positive against 100% of URLtoQR extension's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 4 months. The most recent releases landed on October 10, 2026 and October 25, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Spriv Authenticator versus URLtoQR extension: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSpriv AuthenticatorURLtoQR extension
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings)5.0 (4 ratings) — better
Positive reviews33.3% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings24 — better
Update frequencyEvery 4 monthsEvery 4 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPad, Mac, Vision Pro — better
Requires iOS16.016.0
Further details — not scored
Size6 MB11 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperSprivAlexandre Reol

Customer experience

Spriv Authenticator

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral33.3%
Negative33.3%

URLtoQR extension

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Spriv Authenticator

No in-app purchases

None

URLtoQR extension

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Spriv Authenticator free?
Spriv Authenticator is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is URLtoQR extension free?
URLtoQR extension is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Spriv Authenticator or URLtoQR extension?
URLtoQR extension is rated higher. Spriv Authenticator averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while URLtoQR extension averages 5.0 from 4 ratings.
Do Spriv Authenticator or URLtoQR extension have ads?
Neither Spriv Authenticator nor URLtoQR extension shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Spriv Authenticator or URLtoQR extension?
Spriv Authenticator ships an update every 4 months, and URLtoQR extension every 4 months. Most recently, Spriv Authenticator was updated on October 10, 2026 and URLtoQR extension on October 25, 2026.

Other comparisons