Comparison

CeDAR vs ACHQC

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

CeDAR

This app helps predict the risk and financial impact of wound complications after ventral hernia repair. It uses a mathematical equation based on patient health status to offer individualized outcomes and educational materials about hernias and treatments.

Highlights
  • Predicts postoperative wound complication risks
  • Estimates financial impact of complications
  • Provides individualized patient outcomes
  • Offers educational materials on hernias
  • Calculates risk based on user-answered questions
Features
Read full description

Hernia repairs are among the most common operations performed in the world. Historically, quality was measured almost solely by recurrence rates. Now that routine mesh use has made these repairs much more durable, wound problems after surgery are the major reason for increased cost of surgery, including the added cost of other procedures, hospital stays and clinic visits because of wound problems up to a year after hernia repair. Because of their wounds, these patients often are not able to work and lose time and money because of specialty wound care, travel, clinic visits and/or hospital stays. We believe assessing and understanding a patient's preoperative health status can significantly impact postoperative outcomes. The Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks (CeDAR) predicts the risks and financial impact of wound-related problems following ventral hernia repair. The complex mathematical equation, which was calculated from data taken from patients around the world after their surgery, has been independently tested and found to be accurate and reliable. With the aid of mobile app technology, CeDAR now provides surgeons and patients with a powerful tool that can predict individualized wound outcomes after abdominal hernia surgery. Moreover, it offers patients detailed educational materials about many types of hernias and their treatments. Users simply answer eight questions about themselves, including height and weight. Based on these answers, a percentage chance of developing specific postoperative complications requiring treatment is calculated along with the corresponding cost of this treatment. These results can then be used to discuss an individual patient's risk for wound problems after surgery and what they can change to improve their odds for a good result.

About

ACHQC

This medical app guides patients through hernia and abdominal surgery preparation and recovery. It offers helpful stretches and exercises, and includes a surgical calculator for estimated outcome risks.

Highlights
  • Pre-surgery preparation guide
  • Post-surgery recovery exercises
  • Hernia repair risk calculator
  • Patient education
  • Surgical outcome estimation
Features
Read full description

A guide to help patients understand what to expect before and after hernia and abdominal surgery. Prepare for surgery and recovery with helpful stretches and exercises. The Oracle surgical calculator provides key estimated surgical outcome risks for patients undergoing ventral hernia repairs.

Screenshots

CeDAR4 screens
ACHQC4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: CeDAR at 5.0 against ACHQC's 4.3. CeDAR also leads on iOS requirement (8.0 vs 12.0). ACHQC's advantage is update cadence (every 5 months vs every 18 months) and ratings volume (6 vs 2). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

CeDAR holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.3. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 6 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

CeDAR ships an update every 18 months, ACHQC every 5 months. The most recent releases landed on October 12, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
CeDAR versus ACHQC: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCeDARACHQC
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (2 ratings) — better4.3 (6 ratings)
Positive reviews—66.7% of reviews
Number of ratings26 — better
Update frequencyEvery 18 monthsEvery 5 months — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS8.0 — better12.0
Further details — not scored
Size37 MB25 MB
Age rating12+17+
DeveloperCarolinas Surgical Innovation Group, LLCAbdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative

Customer experience

CeDAR

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

ACHQC

All ratings6 ratings
Positive83.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative16.7%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

In-app purchases

None

CeDAR

No in-app purchases

None

ACHQC

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is CeDAR free?
CeDAR is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is ACHQC free?
ACHQC is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, CeDAR or ACHQC?
CeDAR is rated higher. CeDAR averages 5.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while ACHQC averages 4.3 from 6 ratings.
Do CeDAR or ACHQC have ads?
Neither CeDAR nor ACHQC shows ads.
Which is updated more often, CeDAR or ACHQC?
CeDAR ships an update every 18 months, and ACHQC every 5 months. Most recently, CeDAR was updated on October 12, 2026 and ACHQC on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons