TCP vs WebSocket Client
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
TCP
Control a server remotely using TCP or UDP communication. Configure server IP and port, then send commands from your device.
- Remote server control
- TCP communication
- UDP communication
- Server IP configuration
- Port number configuration
- Send commands
Read full descriptionHide full description
TCP-UDP Client is an iPhone and iPod Touch application that allows you to control a server based on a TCP or UDP communication, whenever and wherever you want. During the device configuration, you just have to insert the server IP address and the port number where the connection will be established. At this point you can send any command you want.
WebSocket Client
This tool allows developers to test WebSocket servers and websites. Users can input URLs, including HTTP, WS, and WSS secure connections, along with specific ports, to verify functionality. It's designed as a testing utility for web development.
- Test WebSocket servers
- Supports HTTP, WS, and WSS URLs
- Input specific ports
- HTML5 protocol testing
- Developer tool
Read full descriptionHide full description
A easy client to test your web socket server/site, simply insert your url (can be used url as HTTP, WS, WSS secure connections) insert the specific port, if necessary, and test it! This is a APP thought as tool for testing for developer. for info about web socket: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebSocket Web socket it's the new protocol of the HTML5 The WebSocket protocol was standardized by the IETF as RFC 6455 in 2011, and the WebSocket API in Web IDL is being standardized by the W3C The WebSocket protocol is currently supported in most major browsers including Google Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari and Opera. WebSocket also requires web applications on the server to support it.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: WebSocket Client at 4.0 against TCP's 3.0. WebSocket Client also leads on review sentiment (100% vs 60%). TCP's advantage is iOS requirement (7.1 vs 16.0). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
WebSocket Client holds the better App Store score, 4.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 6 and 3 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 60% of TCP's written reviews are positive against 100% of WebSocket Client's.
| Parameter | TCP | WebSocket Client |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 3.0 (6 ratings) | 4.0 (3 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 60.0% of reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 6 — better | 3 |
| Update frequency | — | Every 30 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod — better | iPhone |
| Requires iOS | 7.1 — better | 16.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 2 MB | 0 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Lorenzo Greco | Luca Ceci |
Customer experience
TCP
WebSocket Client
In-app purchases
TCP
No in-app purchases
WebSocket Client
No in-app purchases
