Comparison

MqttClient vs Frog Otto

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

MqttClient

This utility app provides a fast client for MQTT, the internet of things protocol. It allows users to test broker servers, monitor topics, send and receive messages, and save configurations for quick access. It's designed for testing MQTT broker activities.

Highlights
  • MQTT client functionality
  • Broker server testing
  • Topic monitoring
  • Send and receive messages
  • Save configurations
  • User/password authentication
Features
Read full description

A simple and fast client for Mqtt, the "internet of things protocol" It can be use for test your Broker server , check if the broker it's online, check your topics. You can send messages and read messages from a topic, you can set user, password, client id, topic, port and server ip. You can save a configuration for fast test. The tool it's made for test activities on Mqtt server Broker, no SSL support at now. Don't insert in HOST "tcp://" only host name or ip

About

Frog Otto

Control a biped robot using a Bluetooth 4.0 connection. This application allows for a variety of actions to be performed by the robot through its interface.

Highlights
  • Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity
  • Control biped robot actions
  • Variety of button controls
  • Robot movement customization
Features
Read full description

This is a Bluetooth APP (4.0) for controlling FrogOtto's biped robot. More buttons can make FrogOtto achieve a variety of actions.

Screenshots

MqttClient2 screens
Frog Otto1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Frog Otto at 5.0 against MqttClient's 1.0. Frog Otto also leads on update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 10 months) and device support (3 vs 1). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Frog Otto holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

MqttClient ships an update every 10 months, Frog Otto every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 6, 2026 and October 14, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
MqttClient versus Frog Otto: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterMqttClientFrog Otto
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings11
Update frequencyEvery 10 monthsEvery 3 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.010.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size1 MB15 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperLuca Ceci克俭 左

Customer experience

MqttClient

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

Frog Otto

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

MqttClient

No in-app purchases

None

Frog Otto

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is MqttClient free?
MqttClient is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Frog Otto free?
Frog Otto is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, MqttClient or Frog Otto?
Frog Otto is rated higher. MqttClient averages 1.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while Frog Otto averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do MqttClient or Frog Otto have ads?
Neither MqttClient nor Frog Otto shows ads.
Which is updated more often, MqttClient or Frog Otto?
MqttClient ships an update every 10 months, and Frog Otto every 3 weeks. Most recently, MqttClient was updated on October 6, 2026 and Frog Otto on October 14, 2026.

Other comparisons