Comparison

Aortic surgery guidelines vs Edwards Masters

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Aortic surgery guidelines

This medical app provides clinicians with patient-specific recommendations for aortic surgery based on established guidelines. It simplifies complex decision-making by guiding users through essential patient data entry to inform surgical indications.

Highlights
  • Patient-specific surgical recommendations
  • Data entry for clinical decision-making
  • Based on AHA, AATS, ACC, CCS, ESC guidelines
  • Pocket tool for grey area decisions
  • Clear surgical indication display
Features
Read full description

Aorta was developed as a collaboration between Consultant Cardiac Surgeons Yoan Lamarche, MD, FRCSC, Ismail El-Hamamsy, MD, PhD, FRCSC and Philippe Demers, MD, FRCSC from the Montreal Heart Institute (Montreal, Canada) and app development company SolidByte Inc. This was made possible by a development grant from the Department of Surgery of the Université de Montréal. Aorta provides the guidelines recommendation based on a set of easy data entry points, which the user simply needs to fill out. The app then combines all the elements and informs the clinician about the presence or absence of a surgical indication according to the AHA, AATS, ACC, CCS and ESC guidelines. Description Aorta is an easy-to-use and comprehensive guide to individualized indications for aortic surgery. Aorta aims to provide clinicians caring for patients with aortic pathologies with patient-specific recommendations for aortic surgery based on the American Heart Association AHA, American Association for Thoracic Surgeons AATS, American College of Cardiology ACC, Canadian Cardiovascular Society CCS and European Society of Cardiology ESC guidelines on aortic diseases. Aorta is the ultimate pocket tool you need when making “grey area” decisions about recommending your patient for surgery. Key features - Guides the user through a set of essential questions for clinical decision-making - Provides a clear recommendation for clinicians caring for specific patients How it works The mechanism is really simple: you fill the form asking informations about your patient (size of the Ascending aorta or root aneurysm). After you submit the form, the application analyze your answers and will display your recommendations about aortic surgery depending on your patient conditions. So it can recommend you an aortic replacement or to make an aggressive follow up depending on the ascending aorta size or if your patient has family history of aortic dissection. The indications given by the applications are based on aortic surgery guidelines from AHA, ACC, AATS, STS, CCS and ESC.

About

Edwards Masters

Features
Read full description

Edwards Masters, a Professional Education platform for cardio-thoracic surgeons. At Edwards Lifesciences, we are dedicated to providing innovative solutions for people fighting cardiovascular disease. In the framework of Professional Education programs, we created Edwards Masters, a Professional Education iOS-based digital platform for cardio-thoracic surgeons. Through high-end content, now also available offline, we aim to provide to the community the best tools to treat patients. Education. In order to achieve this target we’ll deliver several different format of educational content, appropriately personalized for the members of the community. A large selection of scientific resources such as case studies, courses, latest updates on the field with a focus on the most contributive publications, PowerPoints presentations support, opinion leaders’ best practices, and a lot more will we offered. We believe that the community needs to work together and share high-end education in order to reach new horizons, and ultimately improve patients’ health and Healing.

Screenshots

Aortic surgery guidelines2 screens
Edwards Masters4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Aortic surgery guidelines at every 3 weeks against Edwards Masters's every 2 months. Aortic surgery guidelines also leads on iOS requirement (7.0 vs 13.0). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Aortic surgery guidelines ships an update every 3 weeks, Edwards Masters every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 17, 2026 and October 14, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
Aortic surgery guidelines versus Edwards Masters: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAortic surgery guidelinesEdwards Masters
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (1 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings1 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS7.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size4 MB32 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperAortic Surgery GuidelinesEdwards Lifesciences

In-app purchases

None

Aortic surgery guidelines

No in-app purchases

None

Edwards Masters

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Aortic surgery guidelines free?
Aortic surgery guidelines is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Edwards Masters free?
Edwards Masters is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Aortic surgery guidelines or Edwards Masters have ads?
Neither Aortic surgery guidelines nor Edwards Masters shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Aortic surgery guidelines or Edwards Masters?
Aortic surgery guidelines ships an update every 3 weeks, and Edwards Masters every 2 months. Most recently, Aortic surgery guidelines was updated on October 17, 2026 and Edwards Masters on October 14, 2026.

Other comparisons