Comparison

iBrowser vs 眨巴眼

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

iBrowser

This utility offers a full-screen browsing experience with comprehensive search capabilities. It includes a child lock feature to restrict access to specific pages and is compatible with iPhone and iPad devices. Users can access settings and refresh pages through intuitive gestures.

Highlights
  • Full-screen browsing
  • Comprehensive search
  • Child lock for restricted access
  • iPhone and iPad compatible
  • Gesture-based controls
  • No ads or pop-up windows
Features
Read full description

************************************** 【1】Full screen browser, do you want it 【2】Every orientation, do you get it 【3】Fast search, do you try it 【4】iPhone and iPad ready, do you use it 【5】Child Lock: only allow a fixed page Come and try it! No ads and no pop-ups! ************************************** 【How to use】 - Double-tap the search icon on the bottom bar to open Settings - Double-tap the refresh icon on the bottom bar to force refresh the current page - Child Lock: turn on Force Hide Address Bar in Settings - On iPhone, shake the device to show the address bar and toolbar 【Guide】 - The first launch shows a 5-step tour. Finish it and start browsing - Open User Guide in Settings anytime for gestures, Child Lock, and FAQs - Bottom bar from left to right: Back, Forward, Refresh, Search, Home, Full Screen - Tap Search to show or hide the address bar. Tap Full Screen to go borderless at once - Type a URL or a keyword in the address bar. Text starting with http opens as a site. Anything else uses your current search engine - When setting the homepage, tap Use Current Page to make the page you are viewing the startup page - To keep one page as fixed as possible: set the homepage, turn on Child Lock, then enable the Settings password - If the notch covers the page, adjust browser margins in Settings ************************************** Note: If the app does not meet your needs, you can request a refund from Apple within 90 days: https://reportaproblem.apple.com

About

眨巴眼

A minimalist mobile browser focused on core functionality with a clean interface. It offers features like ad blocking, screen casting, custom playback, file management, and ebook reading. Users can also utilize custom scripts for enhanced browsing.

Highlights
  • Minimalist and fast interface
  • Element blocking for clean webpages
  • DLNA screen casting
  • Customizable video player
  • Local and Wi-Fi file management
  • Epub reader with annotation and translation
  • Tampermonkey script support
Features
Read full description

眨巴眼(Blink)是一款极简浏览器。我们坚信要以用户核心功能为中心,交互和界面简洁直接,才是好的产品。 【小巧快速】功能精简,体积小,界面干净,启动运行快速 【屏蔽元素】自由定义屏蔽页面元素,还你干净网页 【投屏】支持DLNA投屏协议,投电视看视频 【自定义播放器】高速播放不卡顿 【文件管理】支持本地文件导入、电脑WIFI传输文件 【超级阅读器】支持本地epub书籍,智能解析文章注释、翻译单词 【自定义脚本】支持油猴脚本 【文件管理】支持本地文件导入、电脑WIFI传输文件 联系我们 设置-建议&反馈 发送问题反馈给我们,留下你的邮箱,我们会回复您。 付费会员服务说明 会员产品及价格(货币单位为人民币)为:连续包月¥15/月, 连续包季¥38/3月, 连续包年¥88/年。 实际费用会转为根据您的国家及地区转换为当地货币。 确认订购后,付款将从您的iTunes账户中扣除。连续包月、包季、包年项目会自动续订,除非在当前期问结束前至少24小时关闭了自动续订。在当前期限结束前的24小时内,将向账户收取续订费用,并将提供续订费用。订阅可以由用户管理。购买后,可以在手机的“设置”中取消订阅。 会员服务协议及隐私政策: https://docs.qq.com/doc/DWkVzQ3RqbW1kZHBR

Screenshots

iBrowser4 screens
眨巴眼4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: 眨巴眼 at Free against iBrowser's $0.89. 眨巴眼 also leads on rating (5.0 vs 1.0) and review sentiment (75% vs 53%). iBrowser's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 7) and update cadence (every 5 days vs every 11 days). On ratings volume, ads, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

眨巴眼 is free to download; iBrowser costs $0.89 up front. 眨巴眼 sells 7 in-app purchases, starting at $1.99 per month. iBrowser asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

眨巴眼 holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 2 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 53% of iBrowser's written reviews are positive against 75% of 眨巴眼's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

iBrowser ships an update every 5 days, 眨巴眼 every 11 days. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
iBrowser versus 眨巴眼: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameteriBrowser眨巴眼
Price$0.89Free — better
Rating1.0 (1 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews52.9% of reviews75.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings12 — better
Update frequencyEvery 5 days — betterEvery 11 days
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationPaidFreemium — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.013.0
Further details — not scored
Size1 MB125 MB
Age rating17+17+
Developer天从 何雁文 孙

Customer experience

iBrowser

All ratings1 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews34 reviews
Positive52.9%
Neutral8.8%
Negative38.2%

眨巴眼

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews12 reviews
Positive75.0%
Neutral16.7%
Negative8.3%

In-app purchases

None

iBrowser

No in-app purchases

7 purchases

眨巴眼

Subscriptions3
  • 连续包月$1.991 Month
  • 连续包季$4.993 Months
  • 连续包年$12.991 Year
One-time4
  • 一个月会员$1.99
  • 1年会员$12.99
  • 2年会员$14.99
Show 1 more
  • 永久会员$14.99

Questions

Is iBrowser free?
iBrowser costs $0.89, with no in-app purchases.
Is 眨巴眼 free?
眨巴眼 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, iBrowser or 眨巴眼?
眨巴眼 is rated higher. iBrowser averages 1.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while 眨巴眼 averages 5.0 from 2 ratings.
Do iBrowser or 眨巴眼 have ads?
Neither iBrowser nor 眨巴眼 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, iBrowser or 眨巴眼?
iBrowser ships an update every 5 days, and 眨巴眼 every 11 days. Most recently, iBrowser was updated on November 6, 2026 and 眨巴眼 on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons