Radioactive Decay Simulator vs AnimalTector
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Radioactive Decay Simulator
This educational tool simulates radioactive decay for a group of atoms. Users can choose preset atoms or input custom half-lives to observe decay in real-time graphs. The simulator allows for adjustments in atom count and speed for efficient analysis.
- Emulates radioactive decay
- Select preset or custom atoms
- Adjust atom count
- Real-time decay graphs
- Adjustable simulation speed
Read full descriptionHide full description
The Radioactive Decay Simulator emulates the radioactive decay of a group of like atoms. Users are able to select from a range of preset atoms, or enter the half-life of a specific atom that they wish to simulate. By adjusting the number of atoms, users are able to determine how even with a large number of atoms, the randomness of radioactive decay can be modeled. Users are able to observe the both number of decayed atoms as well as the number of non-decayed atoms remaining in a real time graph. The simulator can be sped up to allow atoms with a longer half-life to be analyzed quickly.
AnimalTector
Identify animals using advanced AI models. Simply point your device to detect and learn about the species around you. Explore the natural world with powerful recognition technology.
- AI animal detection
- Species identification
- MegaDetector AI
- SpeciesNet AI
- Real-time recognition
Read full descriptionHide full description
Detect and identify animals using the MegaDetector and SpeciesNet AI models.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: AnimalTector at 5.0 against Radioactive Decay Simulator's 4.0. AnimalTector also leads on ratings volume (3 vs 1). Radioactive Decay Simulator's advantage is iOS requirement (9.3 vs 18.2). On price, review sentiment, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
AnimalTector holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 1 and 3 respectively. Written reviews split almost evenly too, at 100% and 100% positive.
| Parameter | Radioactive Decay Simulator | AnimalTector |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.0 (1 ratings) | 5.0 (3 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 100.0% of reviews | 100.0% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 1 | 3 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 17 months | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 9.3 — better | 18.2 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 20 MB | 134 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Alistair Shaw | Pathsharers, LLC |
Customer experience
Radioactive Decay Simulator
AnimalTector
In-app purchases
Radioactive Decay Simulator
No in-app purchases
AnimalTector
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is Radioactive Decay Simulator free?
Is AnimalTector free?
Which has better reviews, Radioactive Decay Simulator or AnimalTector?
Do Radioactive Decay Simulator or AnimalTector have ads?
Other comparisons
