MAPPP vs Michigan MAGIC
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
MAPPP
This medical guide assists clinicians in managing patients on anticoagulation therapy undergoing surgery or invasive procedures. It helps evaluate bleeding and thrombosis risks, guiding decisions on interrupting anticoagulation and using bridging therapy.
- Evaluate bleeding and thrombosis risk
- Guide anticoagulation interruption
- Provide bridging therapy guidance
- Detail drug dosing
- Offer laboratory monitoring advice
- Encourage clinician communication
Read full descriptionHide full description
Despite the considerable efficacy of antithrombotics and the increased number of oral anticoagulants now available, preventable bleeding and thrombotic events are still unacceptably common. While recently marketed agents require less laboratory monitoring, problems with the clinical management of anticoagulated patients persist, particularly in the peri-procedural period. Surgery and invasive medical interventions increase the risk of bleeding, while withholding anticoagulants increases the risk of thrombosis due to the underlying condition(s) for which anticoagulation was originally prescribed. The clinical team must therefore balance these competing risks and make educated decisions regarding the decision to interrupt oral anticoagulation for a medical procedure and, if interrupted, whether to "bridge" anticoagulation with injectable anticoagulants, such as low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in warfarin treated patients. This guide is intended to: -Assist clinicians in the simultaneous evaluation of procedure-related bleeding risk and underlying risk of thrombosis -Guide decisions regarding the interruption of anticoagulation and the use of anticoagulant "bridging" -Provide detailed guidance for drug dosing and laboratory monitoring in the peri-procedural period -Encourage clear communication between clinicians involved in prescribing anticoagulants and performing invasive procedures This material was created by the multidisciplinary members of the Peri-Procedural Task Force of the New York State Anticoagulation Coalition and IPRO, the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization for New York State, under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents do not necessarily reflect CMS policy. 10SOW-NY-AIM-7.3-14-01
Michigan MAGIC
This application provides guidance on the appropriate use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). It helps medical professionals balance the benefits of PICCs against potential complications like deep vein thrombosis and bloodstream infections.
- PICC use recommendations
- Risk-benefit balancing
- Guidance for medical professionals
- Information on PICC complications
- Bedside insertion convenience
Read full descriptionHide full description
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are among the most commonly used central venous catheter (CVC) in contemporary medical practice. The rise in popularity of PICCs reflects several advantages, including safe insertion and growing availability of vascular access nurses that offer convenient bedside insertion. However, PICCs are also associated with important complications, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). Judicious use of PICCs to balance these risks against benefits is therefore necessary. Michigan MAGIC is designed to help guide users by providing recommendations on appropriate PICC use.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: Michigan MAGIC at 100% against MAPPP's 50%. Michigan MAGIC also leads on rating (4.7 vs 4.2) and iOS requirement (9.3 vs 13.0). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Michigan MAGIC holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 4.2. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 5 and 9 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 50% of MAPPP's written reviews are positive against 100% of Michigan MAGIC's.
Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 4 months. The most recent releases landed on October 12, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | MAPPP | Michigan MAGIC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.2 (5 ratings) | 4.7 (9 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 50.0% of reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 5 | 9 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 4 months | Every 4 months |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 | 9.3 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 54 MB | 9 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 17+ |
| Developer | Island Peer Review Organization, Inc | The University of Michigan |
Customer experience
MAPPP
Michigan MAGIC
In-app purchases
MAPPP
No in-app purchases
Michigan MAGIC
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is MAPPP free?
Is Michigan MAGIC free?
Which has better reviews, MAPPP or Michigan MAGIC?
Do MAPPP or Michigan MAGIC have ads?
Which is updated more often, MAPPP or Michigan MAGIC?
Other comparisons















