Comparison

Alveolar vs Mechanical Ventilation Expert

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Alveolar

This app calculates the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-a gradient) and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. It provides formulas and explanations for these important respiratory measurements, useful for medical professionals and students.

Highlights
  • Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient calculation
  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio calculation
  • Formulas for PAO2 and A-a gradient
  • Educational explanations of respiratory measurements
  • Supports room air and variable FiO2
Features
Read full description

A-a oxygen gradient — The alveolar - arterial (A-a) oxygen gradient is a measure of oxygen transfer across alveolar capillary membrane (“A” denotes alveolar and “a” denotes arterial oxygenation). It is the difference between the amount of the oxygen in the alveoli. PAO2 = Alveolar oxygen tension PaO2 = Arterial oxygen tension A-a oxygen gradient = PAO2 - PaO2. PaO2 is derived from ABG while PAO2 is calculated. PAO2 = (FiO2 x [Patm - PH2O]) - (PaCO2 ÷ R) FiO2 is the fraction of inspired oxygen (0.21 at room air). Patm is the atmospheric pressure (760 mmHg at sea level). PH2O is the partial pressure of water (47 mmHg ). PaCO2 is derived from ABG , and R is the respiratory quotient. (The respiratory quotient is approximately 0.8 at normal physiological state) A-a gradient varies with age and can be estimated from the following equation, assuming the patient is breathing room air. A-a gradient = 2.5 + 0.21 x age in years A-a gradient increases with higher FiO2. PaO2/FiO2 ratio — The PaO2/FiO2 ratio is a measure of oxygen transfer across the alveolar capillary membrane . Normal PaO2/FiO2 ratio is 300 to 500 mmHg, with values less than 300 mmHg indicating impaired gas exchange and values less than 200 mmHg indicates severe hypoxemia . Concept By: Dr. Satish Deopujari Dr Vivek Shivhare Disclaimer: This app is based on equations available publicly in Medical domain.  The information contained on this app is intended for educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. You should consult a physician regarding medical diagnosis or treatment.

About

Mechanical Ventilation Expert

This medical app assists intensive care physicians in managing patients with acute respiratory failure. It provides advice on mechanical ventilation parameters and helps determine optimal respiratory support methods based on research findings.

Highlights
  • Mechanical ventilation parameter correction
  • Respiratory support method selection
  • Non-invasive oxygenation index estimation
  • Guidance on invasive and non-invasive ventilation
  • Educational tool for physicians
  • Based on multicenter research
Features
Read full description

Caution! This app is intended for intensive care physicians. If you are NOT a physician and would like to use it anyway, please consult your physician before using this app or making any medical decisions. This app has endorsement for usage in the Russian Federation. Many doctors deal with the treatment of patients with varying degrees of acute respiratory failure (ARF). But the choice of the optimal method and, especially, the timely correction of the parameters of invasive and non-invasive mechanical lung ventilation often cause difficulties, especially for young doctors. Unfortunately, expensive ventilation machines, without their skillful use, are not a guarantee of an improvement in the mortality rate in ARF. This has been especially evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. In international clinical practice, it is customary to determine the degree of ARF by the oxygenation index (the ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)). This indicator is also included in most "severity of illness" scoring systems (SOFA, APACHE II-III, etc.). However PaO2 estimation is only possible after collecting the arterial blood for laboratory monitoring of blood gases, making it costly and invasive. In 2020-2021 a multicenter research was carried out at five clinical hospitals in Volgograd, Russia, which included 1038 patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome against the background of viral (COVID-19) and bacterial pneumonia. The goals of the research were firstly, to develop a non-invasive method for determining the oxygenation index (PaO2 / FiO2) based on oxygen saturation (SpO2), and secondly, to define general criteria for correcting the parameters of invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation. This application is based on the results of the research. The relationship between SpO2 and PaO2 index values was determined for various FiO2 and types of respiratory support. The app also implements the general principle of oxygen therapy - from less to more invasive. The app allows the user not only to choose the most effective method of respiratory support, but also timely learn about the need for its correction. Every clinician knows that the mortality rate in patients with ARF is greatly influenced by the validity of the beginning and end of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation treatment - and this app solves this problem. The educational effect of this app should also be noted. It will help doctors to quickly master and more competently use expensive ventilation machines, which, of course, will have a beneficial effect on the results of treatment of patients with ARF. The following sources were used to create the app: 1. Brown SM, Grissom CK, Moss M, Rice TW, Schoenfeld D, Hou PC, Thompson BT, Brower RG; NIH/NHLBI PETAL Network Collaborators. Nonlinear Imputation of Pao2/Fio2 From Spo2/Fio2 Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Chest. 2016 Aug;150(2):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 19. PMID: 26836924; PMCID: PMC4980543. 2. Bilan N, Dastranji A, Ghalehgolab Behbahani A. Comparison of the spo2/fio2 ratio and the pao2/fio2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2015;7(1):28-31. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2014.06. Epub 2015 Mar 29. PMID: 25859313; PMCID: PMC4378672. 3. Yoshida T, Takegawa R, Ogura H. [Ventilatory strategy for ARDS]. Nihon Rinsho. 2016 Feb;74(2):279-84. Japanese. PMID: 26915253. 4. Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):698-710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907. PMID: 29466596. 5. Петров, В. И. Эволюция клинико-фармакологических и терапевтических принципов лечения инфекции COVID-19 / Петров В. И. [и др. ]. - Москва : ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2021. - 312 с. - DOI: 10.33029/9704-6386-4-ECPC-2021-1-312. - ISBN 978-5-9704-6386-4.

Screenshots

Alveolar1 screens
Mechanical Ventilation Expert3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: Alveolar at 89% against Mechanical Ventilation Expert's 33%. Alveolar also leads on rating (5.0 vs 1.8) and iOS requirement (8.0 vs 13.0). Mechanical Ventilation Expert's advantage is update cadence (every 2 weeks vs every 4 months) and ratings volume (8 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Alveolar holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 1.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Mechanical Ventilation Expert has 8 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 89% of Alveolar's written reviews are positive against 33% of Mechanical Ventilation Expert's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Alveolar ships an update every 4 months, Mechanical Ventilation Expert every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 4, 2026 and November 3, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
Alveolar versus Mechanical Ventilation Expert: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterAlveolarMechanical Ventilation Expert
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better1.8 (8 ratings)
Positive reviews88.9% of reviews — better33.3% of reviews
Number of ratings18 — better
Update frequencyEvery 4 monthsEvery 2 weeks — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS8.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size16 MB1 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperSatish DeopujariValeriy Streltsov

Customer experience

Alveolar

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews9 reviews
Positive88.9%
Neutral11.1%
Negative0.0%

Mechanical Ventilation Expert

All ratings7 ratings
Positive14.3%
Neutral14.3%
Negative71.4%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral33.3%
Negative33.3%

In-app purchases

None

Alveolar

No in-app purchases

None

Mechanical Ventilation Expert

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Alveolar free?
Alveolar is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Mechanical Ventilation Expert free?
Mechanical Ventilation Expert is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Alveolar or Mechanical Ventilation Expert?
Alveolar is rated higher. Alveolar averages 5.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while Mechanical Ventilation Expert averages 1.8 from 8 ratings.
Do Alveolar or Mechanical Ventilation Expert have ads?
Neither Alveolar nor Mechanical Ventilation Expert shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Alveolar or Mechanical Ventilation Expert?
Alveolar ships an update every 4 months, and Mechanical Ventilation Expert every 2 weeks. Most recently, Alveolar was updated on November 4, 2026 and Mechanical Ventilation Expert on November 3, 2026.

Other comparisons