Not bad
I didn’t have any troubles connecting them to my phone or the app sound quality is good just wish it was a bit more sound proof
DONT WAIST YOUR MONEY
Will not connect to phone. And OMG the agreements are effed up.
Doesn’t work
Won’t connect. Not sure what the point of this app is, no matter what you do it can’t find the earbuds that are on and paintable and touching the phone.
Translations
Before the latest update the Japanese translations were much better and the delay increased. Not sure why. I travel a lot and it was very useful until this week.
Help
Feature request — please add Igbo language support
Hello Team,
I’m using the Earjoy Intelligence app on an iPhone 17 Pro Max with the latest app version. I’d like to request that you add Igbo (Igbo/Ndi Igbo) as a supported translation/UI language. Igbo is widely spoken and adding it would greatly improve accessibility and user experience for many Nigerian and global users.
Do you have plans or a timeline to add Igbo? If you accept community contributions, I (or others) would be happy to help with translations or testing.
Thank you for considering this request.
Best regards,
Michelle
Hello Team,
I’m using the Earjoy Intelligence app on an iPhone 17 Pro Max with the latest app version. I’d like to request that you add Igbo (Igbo/Ndi Igbo) as a supported translation/UI language. Igbo is widely spoken and adding it would greatly improve accessibility and user experience for many Nigerian and global users.
Do you have plans or a timeline to add Igbo? If you accept community contributions, I (or others) would be happy to help with translations or testing.
Thank you for considering this request.
Best regards,
Michelle
Show more
Fraudulent
Information is power
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
• Exemptions: Rights are not absolute. Data may be withheld if it contains information about other people (third-party rights) or if it jeopardises a criminal investigation.
Practical Steps
Identify the Controller: Determine exactly who holds your data (e.g., the HR department or a specific police force).
Be Specific: While you can ask for "all data," you get faster results by specifying dates or topics (e.g., "all emails regarding my grievance between May and June").
Submit in Writing: Although a SAR can be made verbally, a written request provides a vital paper trail for the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) if they fail to comply.
Documentation Advice
Always keep a copy of your original request and proof of postage or a "read receipt" for emails. If an organisation claims an exemption, they must explain why it applies. Keep their response as evidence for any future tribunal or complaint.
Common Misconceptions
"It's only for digital files": Wrong. It includes paper records and even CCTV or bodycam footage where you are identifiable.
"They can delete it once I ask": No. Deleting data to avoid a SAR is a criminal offence under Section 173 of the DPA 2018.
What the Law Says
In the digital age, your personal data is an extension of your identity. Under UK law, you have the "Right of Access," commonly known as making a Subject Access Request (SAR). This allows you to see what information organisations—including employers, retailers, and public bodies—hold about you, why they have it, and who they share it with.
Statutory Authority
The primary framework is the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), supplemented by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018).
Specifically, Article 15 of the UK GDPR enshrines your right to obtain a copy of your personal data.
Relevant Case Law
The case of R (on the application of Bridges) v CC
South Wales [2020] highlighted the complexities of data rights regarding automated facial recognition.
This landmark ruling reinforced that public bodies must have a clear legal basis and conduct rigorous impact assessments when processing sensitive biometric data, setting a precedent for individual privacy against state surveillance.
Legal Thresholds
Response Time: Organisations generally have one month to respond to a SAR. This can be extended by a further two months for complex requests.
Fees: In most cases, you cannot be charged a fee for a SAR.
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
"I need a lawyer to ask": You don't need representation to start the process, but you may need it if they refuse to comply or if the data reveals a legal breach.
When to Escalate
If an organisation fails to respond within the statutory timeframe, or provides heavily redacted information without a valid legal reason, you should escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) or seek legal counsel.
For bespoke legal assistance navigating complex
UK legal matters, contact 1Veritas. Know your rights. Act lawfully.
Lawsuit
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
• Exemptions: Rights are not absolute. Data may be withheld if it contains information about other people (third-party rights) or if it jeopardises a criminal investigation.
Practical Steps
Identify the Controller: Determine exactly who holds your data (e.g., the HR department or a specific police force).
Be Specific: While you can ask for "all data," you get faster results by specifying dates or topics (e.g., "all emails regarding my grievance between May and June").
Submit in Writing: Although a SAR can be made verbally, a written request provides a vital paper trail for the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) if they fail to comply.
Documentation Advice
Always keep a copy of your original request and proof of postage or a "read receipt" for emails. If an organisation claims an exemption, they must explain why it applies. Keep their response as evidence for any future tribunal or complaint.
Common Misconceptions
"It's only for digital files": Wrong. It includes paper records and even CCTV or bodycam footage where you are identifiable.
"They can delete it once I ask": No. Deleting data to avoid a SAR is a criminal offence under Section 173 of the DPA 2018.
What the Law Says
In the digital age, your personal data is an extension of your identity. Under UK law, you have the "Right of Access," commonly known as making a Subject Access Request (SAR). This allows you to see what information organisations—including employers, retailers, and public bodies—hold about you, why they have it, and who they share it with.
Statutory Authority
The primary framework is the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), supplemented by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018).
Specifically, Article 15 of the UK GDPR enshrines your right to obtain a copy of your personal data.
Relevant Case Law
The case of R (on the application of Bridges) v CC
South Wales [2020] highlighted the complexities of data rights regarding automated facial recognition.
This landmark ruling reinforced that public bodies must have a clear legal basis and conduct rigorous impact assessments when processing sensitive biometric data, setting a precedent for individual privacy against state surveillance.
Legal Thresholds
Response Time: Organisations generally have one month to respond to a SAR. This can be extended by a further two months for complex requests.
Fees: In most cases, you cannot be charged a fee for a SAR.
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
"I need a lawyer to ask": You don't need representation to start the process, but you may need it if they refuse to comply or if the data reveals a legal breach.
When to Escalate
If an organisation fails to respond within the statutory timeframe, or provides heavily redacted information without a valid legal reason, you should escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) or seek legal counsel.
For bespoke legal assistance navigating complex
UK legal matters, contact 1Veritas. Know your rights. Act lawfully.
Lawsuit
Show more
Lawsuit common law, common law still stands this is a lawsuit you don’t get to breach my day to form
165 breach of data act 2018 is broken poor performance tracking hacking all of the above when it concerns this device I will be suing. There’s no misunderstanding anyone who violate my Right my privacy my phone my peace in any kind of way. Will be sued and will be punished now I play no games with anybody at this point. I’ve had enough. I fight back. Information is power
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
• Exemptions: Rights are not absolute. Data may be withheld if it contains information about other people (third-party rights) or if it jeopardises a criminal investigation.
Practical Steps
Identify the Controller: Determine exactly who holds your data (e.g., the HR department or a specific police force).
Be Specific: While you can ask for "all data," you get faster results by specifying dates or topics (e.g., "all emails regarding my grievance between May and June").
Submit in Writing: Although a SAR can be made verbally, a written request provides a vital paper trail for the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) if they fail to comply.
Documentation Advice
Always keep a copy of your original request and proof of postage or a "read receipt" for emails. If an organisation claims an exemption, they must explain why it applies. Keep their response as evidence for any future tribunal or complaint.
Common Misconceptions
"It's only for digital files": Wrong. It includes paper records and even CCTV or bodycam footage where you are identifiable.
"They can delete it once I ask": No. Deleting data to avoid a SAR is a criminal offence under Section 173 of the DPA 2018.
What the Law Says
In the digital age, your personal data is an extension of your identity. Under UK law, you have the "Right of Access," commonly known as making a Subject Access Request (SAR). This allows you to see what information organisations—including employers, retailers, and public bodies—hold about you, why they have it, and who they share it with.
Statutory Authority
The primary framework is the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), supplemented by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018).
Specifically, Article 15 of the UK GDPR enshrines your right to obtain a copy of your personal data.
Relevant Case Law
The case of R (on the application of Bridges) v CC
South Wales [2020] highlighted the complexities of data rights regarding automated facial recognition.
This landmark ruling reinforced that public bodies must have a clear legal basis and conduct rigorous impact assessments when processing sensitive biometric data, setting a precedent for individual privacy against state surveillance.
Legal Thresholds
Response Time: Organisations generally have one month to respond to a SAR. This can be extended by a further two months for complex requests.
Fees: In most cases, you cannot be charged a fee for a SAR.
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
"I need a lawyer to ask": You don't need representation to start the process, but you may need it if they refuse to comply or if the data reveals a legal breach.
When to Escalate
If an organisation fails to respond within the statutory timeframe, or provides heavily redacted information without a valid legal reason, you should escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) or seek legal counsel.
For bespoke legal assistance navigating complex
UK legal matters, contact 1Veritas. Know your rights. Act lawfully.
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
• Exemptions: Rights are not absolute. Data may be withheld if it contains information about other people (third-party rights) or if it jeopardises a criminal investigation.
Practical Steps
Identify the Controller: Determine exactly who holds your data (e.g., the HR department or a specific police force).
Be Specific: While you can ask for "all data," you get faster results by specifying dates or topics (e.g., "all emails regarding my grievance between May and June").
Submit in Writing: Although a SAR can be made verbally, a written request provides a vital paper trail for the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) if they fail to comply.
Documentation Advice
Always keep a copy of your original request and proof of postage or a "read receipt" for emails. If an organisation claims an exemption, they must explain why it applies. Keep their response as evidence for any future tribunal or complaint.
Common Misconceptions
"It's only for digital files": Wrong. It includes paper records and even CCTV or bodycam footage where you are identifiable.
"They can delete it once I ask": No. Deleting data to avoid a SAR is a criminal offence under Section 173 of the DPA 2018.
What the Law Says
In the digital age, your personal data is an extension of your identity. Under UK law, you have the "Right of Access," commonly known as making a Subject Access Request (SAR). This allows you to see what information organisations—including employers, retailers, and public bodies—hold about you, why they have it, and who they share it with.
Statutory Authority
The primary framework is the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), supplemented by the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018).
Specifically, Article 15 of the UK GDPR enshrines your right to obtain a copy of your personal data.
Relevant Case Law
The case of R (on the application of Bridges) v CC
South Wales [2020] highlighted the complexities of data rights regarding automated facial recognition.
This landmark ruling reinforced that public bodies must have a clear legal basis and conduct rigorous impact assessments when processing sensitive biometric data, setting a precedent for individual privacy against state surveillance.
Legal Thresholds
Response Time: Organisations generally have one month to respond to a SAR. This can be extended by a further two months for complex requests.
Fees: In most cases, you cannot be charged a fee for a SAR.
Manifestly Unfounded or Excessive: An organisation can refuse a request or charge a
"reasonable fee" if they can prove the request is clearly intended to cause malicious disruption or is repetitive.
"I need a lawyer to ask": You don't need representation to start the process, but you may need it if they refuse to comply or if the data reveals a legal breach.
When to Escalate
If an organisation fails to respond within the statutory timeframe, or provides heavily redacted information without a valid legal reason, you should escalate the matter to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) or seek legal counsel.
For bespoke legal assistance navigating complex
UK legal matters, contact 1Veritas. Know your rights. Act lawfully.
Show more
Lawsuit common law, common law still stands this is a lawsuit you don’t get to breach my day to form
165 breach of data act 2018 is broken poor performance tracking hacking all of the above when it concerns this device I will be suing. There’s no misunderstanding anyone who violate my Right my privacy my phone my peace in any kind of way. Will be sued and will be punished now I play no games with anybody at this point. I’ve had enough. I fight back.
Show more
Ms190 download saymi app
Ms190 earbuds wont connect to earjoy
Waste
I received these as a gift because I travel a lot. They connect to Bluetooth via my settings option on Apple but not on the app. Meaning none of the features work. It’s been search for a connection since I got them a month ago. I reset them. Deleted the app and still nothing. I don’t need another device to listen to music. I already have AirPods and Beats.
Show more
Slow
It seems to do a good job translating but the delay can lag behind quite a bit. It could be fast when listening to lectures.
Equalizer problem
The equaliser is stuck on Blues preset, i am able to change presets but it does not apply. Still stays on the blues preset even if you switch to another.
Changing manually in the custom setting doesn't do anything. I deleted the app and forgot my earbuds on bluetooth, reconnected them and redownloaded the app, still stuck on the blue preset.
Please fix it as soon possible!
Changing manually in the custom setting doesn't do anything. I deleted the app and forgot my earbuds on bluetooth, reconnected them and redownloaded the app, still stuck on the blue preset.
Please fix it as soon possible!
Show more
Lackluster
This app does not live up to the sales pitch. It is very bare bones and buggy. I am extremely disappointed with the app.
2018 protection breach
⸻
TO:
The Director of Legal
⸻
NOTICE OF RECORD – READ IN FULL
This document is a formal lawful letter, issued under due process of law, full disclosure, and full transparency.
It is not an email, article, circular, or opinion.
It is served as a notice of record and stands as evidence.
⸻
1. STATUS, STANDING, AND CAPACITY
1.1 I write in my sole and lawful capacity as a Living Woman — Living Soul, one of the people.
1.2 I do not stand as, consent to be treated as, or accept classification as any corporate fiction, statutory PERSON, legal entity, trust, surety, ward, or administrative construct.
1.3 Any attempt to treat me otherwise, without lawful proof and authority, constitutes fraud by misrepresentation, abuse of power, and misfeasance in public office.
⸻
2. DUE PROCESS OF LAW (ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT)
2.1 Due process of law is not optional, procedural, or discretionary. It is a mandatory and non‑derogable legal requirement.
2.2 Due process requires all of the following, without exception:
a) Lawful jurisdiction
b) Lawful authority
c) Lawful standing
d) Full and timely disclosure of material facts
e) Absence of bias or predetermination
f) Opportunity to be heard
g) Lawful judgment by a competent authority
2.3 Any act taken in the absence of any single element above is unlawful, void ab initio, and without legal effect.
⸻
3. MAGNA CARTA – CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
3.1 Magna Carta 1215, Clause 39, protects all free women from harm, detention, dispossession, or proceedings except by lawful judgment or the law of the land.
3.2 Magna Carta 1217, together with the Charter of the Forest 1217, restrains arbitrary power, protects livelihood, land, and liberty, and prohibits administrative exploitation.
3.3 Magna Carta 1297 enacted and confirmed the above charters into statute, binding the Crown, Parliament, courts, public officers, agents, and institutions.
3.4 These authorities remain in full force, having never been lawfully repealed.
3.5 ARTICLE 61 – ENFORCEMENT CLAUSE
3.5.1 Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 provides that if the King, his officers, or agents fail to uphold the liberties guaranteed in the Charter, the barons have the lawful authority to enforce compliance, including the right to secure remedies and safeguards for violations.
3.5.2 This clause confirms that any officer, agent, or institution that breaches constitutional rights, liberties, or due process is acting unlawfully and may be held personally liable.
3.5.3 As a Living Woman — Living Soul, I rely on Article 61 to demand compliance, accountability, and full remedy for violations of lawful rights and protections.
3.5.4 Failure to respect Article 61 constitutes an ongoing breach of constitutional law, justifying immediate action to correct unlawful conduct.
⸻
4. BILL OF RIGHTS 1689
4.1 The Bill of Rights 1689 prohibits:
• Arbitrary power
• Unlawful penalties
• Abuse of office
• Proceedings without lawful authority
4.2 Any administrative or enforcement action taken without lawful authority is constitutionally unlawful.
⸻
5. GROSS MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE
5.1 Gross misconduct includes, but is not limited to:
a) Acting without lawful jurisdiction
b) Ignoring or bypassing due process
c) Suppressing, altering, or withholding evidence
d) Misrepresenting authority or status
e) Failing to disclose decision‑makers
f) Continuing unlawful conduct after notice
5.2 Such conduct engages personal liability, not merely institutional responsibility.
⸻
6. ABUSE OF POWER
6.1 Abuse of power occurs where authority is exercised:
• For an improper purpose
• Without lawful basis
• In excess of jurisdiction
• In a manner causing harm
6.2 Abuse of power invalidates all resulting actions.
⸻
7. UNLAWFUL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
7.1 Administrative process does not override law.
7.2 Any decision or action taken without:
• Written lawful authority
• Identifiable accountable officers
• Full disclosure
• Proven jurisdiction
is unlawful and void.
⸻
8. FRAUD ACT 2006 – CRIMINAL ELEMENTS
8.1 Section 2 – Fraud by False Representation: Knowingly or recklessly misrepresenting authority, status, jurisdiction, or facts.
8.2 Section 3 – Fraud by Failing to Disclose Information: Withholding information where there is a legal duty to disclose.
8.3 Section 4 – Fraud by Abuse of Position: Abusing a position of trust to cause loss or risk of loss.
8.4 Criminal intent is established where conduct is deliberate, repeated, or maintained after formal notice.
⸻
9. EFFECTS AND HARM CAUSED
9.1 The unlawful actions complained of have caused:
• Loss of lawful rights
• Emotional and psychological distress
• Administrative and reputational harm
• Financial loss
• Obstruction of lawful remedy
9.2 These harms were foreseeable, avoidable, and directly caused by the conduct described.
⸻
10. DISCRIMINATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS
10.1 Discrimination of any form is unlawful.
10.2 The Human Rights Act 1998 protects:
• Dignity
• Liberty
• Fair process
• Freedom from arbitrary interference
10.3 Breaches give rise to both institutional and personal liability.
⸻
11. DATA, RECORDS, AND TRANSPARENCY
11.1 All data and records concerning me must be accurate, lawful, complete, and disclosed.
11.2 Continued reliance on known inaccuracies constitutes ongoing unlawful conduct.
⸻
12. EXPRESS NON‑CONSENT
12.1 N
TO:
The Director of Legal
⸻
NOTICE OF RECORD – READ IN FULL
This document is a formal lawful letter, issued under due process of law, full disclosure, and full transparency.
It is not an email, article, circular, or opinion.
It is served as a notice of record and stands as evidence.
⸻
1. STATUS, STANDING, AND CAPACITY
1.1 I write in my sole and lawful capacity as a Living Woman — Living Soul, one of the people.
1.2 I do not stand as, consent to be treated as, or accept classification as any corporate fiction, statutory PERSON, legal entity, trust, surety, ward, or administrative construct.
1.3 Any attempt to treat me otherwise, without lawful proof and authority, constitutes fraud by misrepresentation, abuse of power, and misfeasance in public office.
⸻
2. DUE PROCESS OF LAW (ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT)
2.1 Due process of law is not optional, procedural, or discretionary. It is a mandatory and non‑derogable legal requirement.
2.2 Due process requires all of the following, without exception:
a) Lawful jurisdiction
b) Lawful authority
c) Lawful standing
d) Full and timely disclosure of material facts
e) Absence of bias or predetermination
f) Opportunity to be heard
g) Lawful judgment by a competent authority
2.3 Any act taken in the absence of any single element above is unlawful, void ab initio, and without legal effect.
⸻
3. MAGNA CARTA – CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY
3.1 Magna Carta 1215, Clause 39, protects all free women from harm, detention, dispossession, or proceedings except by lawful judgment or the law of the land.
3.2 Magna Carta 1217, together with the Charter of the Forest 1217, restrains arbitrary power, protects livelihood, land, and liberty, and prohibits administrative exploitation.
3.3 Magna Carta 1297 enacted and confirmed the above charters into statute, binding the Crown, Parliament, courts, public officers, agents, and institutions.
3.4 These authorities remain in full force, having never been lawfully repealed.
3.5 ARTICLE 61 – ENFORCEMENT CLAUSE
3.5.1 Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 provides that if the King, his officers, or agents fail to uphold the liberties guaranteed in the Charter, the barons have the lawful authority to enforce compliance, including the right to secure remedies and safeguards for violations.
3.5.2 This clause confirms that any officer, agent, or institution that breaches constitutional rights, liberties, or due process is acting unlawfully and may be held personally liable.
3.5.3 As a Living Woman — Living Soul, I rely on Article 61 to demand compliance, accountability, and full remedy for violations of lawful rights and protections.
3.5.4 Failure to respect Article 61 constitutes an ongoing breach of constitutional law, justifying immediate action to correct unlawful conduct.
⸻
4. BILL OF RIGHTS 1689
4.1 The Bill of Rights 1689 prohibits:
• Arbitrary power
• Unlawful penalties
• Abuse of office
• Proceedings without lawful authority
4.2 Any administrative or enforcement action taken without lawful authority is constitutionally unlawful.
⸻
5. GROSS MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE
5.1 Gross misconduct includes, but is not limited to:
a) Acting without lawful jurisdiction
b) Ignoring or bypassing due process
c) Suppressing, altering, or withholding evidence
d) Misrepresenting authority or status
e) Failing to disclose decision‑makers
f) Continuing unlawful conduct after notice
5.2 Such conduct engages personal liability, not merely institutional responsibility.
⸻
6. ABUSE OF POWER
6.1 Abuse of power occurs where authority is exercised:
• For an improper purpose
• Without lawful basis
• In excess of jurisdiction
• In a manner causing harm
6.2 Abuse of power invalidates all resulting actions.
⸻
7. UNLAWFUL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
7.1 Administrative process does not override law.
7.2 Any decision or action taken without:
• Written lawful authority
• Identifiable accountable officers
• Full disclosure
• Proven jurisdiction
is unlawful and void.
⸻
8. FRAUD ACT 2006 – CRIMINAL ELEMENTS
8.1 Section 2 – Fraud by False Representation: Knowingly or recklessly misrepresenting authority, status, jurisdiction, or facts.
8.2 Section 3 – Fraud by Failing to Disclose Information: Withholding information where there is a legal duty to disclose.
8.3 Section 4 – Fraud by Abuse of Position: Abusing a position of trust to cause loss or risk of loss.
8.4 Criminal intent is established where conduct is deliberate, repeated, or maintained after formal notice.
⸻
9. EFFECTS AND HARM CAUSED
9.1 The unlawful actions complained of have caused:
• Loss of lawful rights
• Emotional and psychological distress
• Administrative and reputational harm
• Financial loss
• Obstruction of lawful remedy
9.2 These harms were foreseeable, avoidable, and directly caused by the conduct described.
⸻
10. DISCRIMINATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS
10.1 Discrimination of any form is unlawful.
10.2 The Human Rights Act 1998 protects:
• Dignity
• Liberty
• Fair process
• Freedom from arbitrary interference
10.3 Breaches give rise to both institutional and personal liability.
⸻
11. DATA, RECORDS, AND TRANSPARENCY
11.1 All data and records concerning me must be accurate, lawful, complete, and disclosed.
11.2 Continued reliance on known inaccuracies constitutes ongoing unlawful conduct.
⸻
12. EXPRESS NON‑CONSENT
12.1 N
Show more
Upset and disappointed
Doesn’t work well and the app charged my Apple Pay $15 just to download it. Does not show in my Apple Pay history to be able to get refund or even dispute.
Feature is needed
Cool but improvement required. On the display I would like to see the time and date all the time but it is only available on limited screens wallpaper that is very childish and I hope you can add personalised wallpaper with time and date display. Highly appreciated
Silver Linings
One thing that people all too often overlook in haste and perhaps under duress or while fueled by disappointment, are the little things that we all take for granted. I’m an explorer, and I once lost my earbuds on an expedition. The sound location feature wasn’t going to work because the terrible din of an Icebreaker makes it quite impossible, BUT the GPS Location feature is spot on! I tapped the search beacon and “BAM!” Right there just sighing the Arctic Circle the dot appears! So I flipped a [deleted] and headed back to the igloo where I’d been chillin literally and right there next to an Eagle Feather adorned Peace Pipe were my earbuds, safe and sound. . . Another happy ending
Show more
Finicky app only works when it wants to
Translator stops working until you delete it and re-download it Most of the time it decides to translate half the other time it does not
Cannot connect
That says it all
Beautiful load of garbage
This app is great if you’re looking for something that will take up space, tell you to turn on your already turned on bluetooth, continuously search for a device that it will somehow never find, and only ever succeed fantastically at failing to do anything despite the fake and/or paid for reviews attempting to claim otherwise.
Show more
