Copy-paste of Tinder with bad UI
Main features are organised like in Tinder. But user-interface (UI) is worse.
There are so many pictures of women, when UI partly covers the upper 10% of their pictures, as a result their face on the profile pictures are not visible. Can you fix it?
As I said it is copy-paste of Tinder, the main difference is audience much sexualised women, it is not a merit of the development team.
But the behavioural patterns are the same as on Tinder. Ladies ignore men.
You would better display users' last activity. I suppose most profiles go unused for many months, and users probably deleted their applications without deleting their accounts. As a result, my likes and messages are not read by ladies.
Another feature you would be better off adding is letting me know whether she has seen my sent likes and messages.
The final suggestion is to inform her how many unread messages she has. It is a good proxy for her activity here and her approach to reading/ignoring men’s messages, and whether she ignores them.
I don't understand why you haven’t done it yet. It is so obvious! If I were your project manager, I would include all features here.
There are so many pictures of women, when UI partly covers the upper 10% of their pictures, as a result their face on the profile pictures are not visible. Can you fix it?
As I said it is copy-paste of Tinder, the main difference is audience much sexualised women, it is not a merit of the development team.
But the behavioural patterns are the same as on Tinder. Ladies ignore men.
You would better display users' last activity. I suppose most profiles go unused for many months, and users probably deleted their applications without deleting their accounts. As a result, my likes and messages are not read by ladies.
Another feature you would be better off adding is letting me know whether she has seen my sent likes and messages.
The final suggestion is to inform her how many unread messages she has. It is a good proxy for her activity here and her approach to reading/ignoring men’s messages, and whether she ignores them.
I don't understand why you haven’t done it yet. It is so obvious! If I were your project manager, I would include all features here.
Show more
Great but expensive
It’s a great app with real, Christian members who want to find love. My only issue is that it is very expensive, if you don’t pay premium then you can’t see any of your likes. It would make more sense to advertise as a paid app, as the non premium version is stagnant.
Disappointed too
What is the point of having the app if you block people from seeing each other? Especially as a Christian dating app. what is the purpose of this app? policing everyone from making connections, And payment makes no difference
Can’t even create account
So many glitches and bugs I can’t get past typing in my interests and what I value there’s NO CONTINUE bottom just blank stuck on that page
Technical Mess
Joined up. Paid for premium. Filled out profile. My profile was reviewed and found not good enough. So they restricted access. Spent time and effort updating. Still had logging in issues. Now account is deleted. Yet have paid for premium. Contacted help which whilst responding, informed me the app has issues when switching from phone data to WiFi. Asked for refund as not wasting 3 hours again only for all that to be deleted. Absolutely shocking app to have so many issues with a paid subscription. Really disappointing from a Christian standpoint, you expect this from other companies, not a company that pitches itself as having expected values.
Show more
