التطبيق لا يدعم اللغة العربي
Difficult to liquidate assets
The only way to get out of a property is to sell it during specific periods. This is problematic as you’re basically selling to other investors who are looking for deals and are also trying to liquidate their properties.
In short, you’re going to have to sell your property at a very steep discounted price plus pay Stake’s fees, which dramatically reduces profitability.
Stake really needs to provide alternative means of liquidating properties as does Fundrise and other eREIT companies. I can understand paying a penalty for an early withdrawal, but I do not like the system of being limited to specific periods of sale availability when everyone is trying to sell their properties at the same time. It essentially defeats the purpose of competitive pricing. I do not recommend this company.
Response from developer
Thank you for this detailed and thoughtful review. You clearly understand the mechanics, so this deserves a substantive reply rather than a standard one. You've described the Exit Window dynamic accurately. It's a peer-to-peer market, and in periods when more investors are selling than buying, pricing pressure works against sellers, which is why meaningful discounts have been needed in recent windows. We're upfront that Exit Windows are an early exit option rather than the intended one, and not a route we necessarily recommend. The platform is designed around a four to five year holding period ending in a property sale with proceeds returned to all shareholders, and across more than 40 completed exits to date, average holding periods have been three to four years with average annualized returns of around 10%. That's the mechanism through which profitability is designed to be realised, rather than through early secondary sales. On the comparison to eREIT structures, it's worth noting one structural difference. Platforms offering ongoing redemptions typically operate pooled funds that buy back shares from a cash reserve, whereas Stake investors own shares in specific individual properties, which offers direct ownership and transparency but means liquidity depends on finding a buyer for that specific asset. Each approach has genuine trade-offs. That said, your feedback on providing alternative liquidity mechanisms is fair and constructive, and we're sharing it with our product and leadership teams, as improving secondary liquidity is something we think about seriously. Thank you again for the considered feedback. If you'd like to discuss your portfolio or the realistic options available to you, please reach out to us at contact@getstake.com.
Worst
No return received after one month
They said it is bank regulation
Be ware
Application issue
Response from developer
Hello, we're sorry to hear that you're facing issues opening the app. Could you kindly reach out to our team at contact@getstake.com so that they can look into this for you?
