A test still used
Originally szondi developed the test as an occupational assessment to help people not go crazy by seing where their issue is developing due to a deficit in an are of their life.
That being said its one of few tests that say it needs multiple samples of entry to capture a full arc of your personality baseline. Many people who aren’t aware of his perspective and reason for using the terms in the fashion they were used scrutinize the validity of its results. Using out dated photos is the most critical part because each person was interviewed and analyzed in a non disclosed way. Nowadays bots on dating apps are sometimes used a diluted version using Leopold’s face card test.
Its a great way to get an idea ofwhere you are mentally when you cant make sense of what you cant put a finger on. I use it to capture the state of mind of my dates to see if they are being honest with themselves and to help me see if i am not seing something important.
That being said its one of few tests that say it needs multiple samples of entry to capture a full arc of your personality baseline. Many people who aren’t aware of his perspective and reason for using the terms in the fashion they were used scrutinize the validity of its results. Using out dated photos is the most critical part because each person was interviewed and analyzed in a non disclosed way. Nowadays bots on dating apps are sometimes used a diluted version using Leopold’s face card test.
Its a great way to get an idea ofwhere you are mentally when you cant make sense of what you cant put a finger on. I use it to capture the state of mind of my dates to see if they are being honest with themselves and to help me see if i am not seing something important.
Show more
Load of crap
Not reliable, not valid, and worse than worthless. Inclusion in the App Store under the guise of psychological testing is ethically questionable and potentially harmful.
just what it says on the tin, y’all
nutshell: this is historical reënactment, not drive-thru psychoanalysis.
it makes me sad when consumers get an app without understanding its purpose, then slapping it with 1 star because because it won’t function based on assumption. yellow and blue will never make green in an app operating in rgb or cymk colorspace, for example. yeah, i’d like a child-friendly color mixer, but i haven’t found one yet.
meanwhile, this app runs an “antique” (as it were) personality assessment, using images relevant and contemporary to the period it served. eventually, you’ll be asked to pay for more tests.
that’s all there is to know.
it makes me sad when consumers get an app without understanding its purpose, then slapping it with 1 star because because it won’t function based on assumption. yellow and blue will never make green in an app operating in rgb or cymk colorspace, for example. yeah, i’d like a child-friendly color mixer, but i haven’t found one yet.
meanwhile, this app runs an “antique” (as it were) personality assessment, using images relevant and contemporary to the period it served. eventually, you’ll be asked to pay for more tests.
that’s all there is to know.
Show more
Don’t bother with this one!
Well, I thought, it’s only a buck. What you get isa “test” in which you chose your favorite and least favorite of a bunch of old drawings of faces and the app makes bizarre and insulting observations about you. Save your money, I wish I had.
Haphazard Results
Complete test but results are very jumbled and incoherent.
