Yeah Na
Yeah an
Response from developer
Thanks for your feedback. We’re sorry about the incorrect ID issues. If you still have the photo(s), please send them to weeds@invasives.com.au to help investigate. We are working on an update which significantly increases the number of training images per species, so identification suggestions should be more accurate soon. This includes the training sets for Myriophyllum aquaticum and Erica arborea.
Clunky and misleading
Response from developer
Thanks for your feedback. We’re sorry the suggestions were inaccurate. We’re working on a new update which includes many changes to improve the ID component. Primarily substantially larger training sets for the model to learn on, nearly double the species coverage, and implementing a threshold of confidence, below which a record cannot be created due to uncertainty. We’re looking into ways we can make the species list easier to navigate (for disagreeing with the suggestion) including filtering options.
ID needs work
Response from developer
Thanks for your feedback. We’re working on a new update which includes many changes to improve the ID component. Primarily substantially larger training sets for the model to learn on, nearly double the species coverage, and implementing a threshold of confidence, below which a record cannot be created due to uncertainty.
Amazing
Response from developer
Hi there, thanks so much for the positive feedback! We will continue to work on ironing out inaccuracies, and keep an eye out for a new update soon with many more species!
Absolutely unreliable
Response from developer
Hi there, thanks for your feedback. We’re sorry that WeedScan did not identify weeds well for you. WeedScan uses a live updating image recognition engine that provides suggestions, and the speed with which these suggestions update can be tailored using the settings menu (under “Weed Update Frequency”). If it is cycling through suggestions quickly then it’s likely that it is quite unsure of species, and thus a less reliable estimate. This is usually because the species is not covered by the WeedScan AI model, or the image is being captured from too far away from the plant. Regarding accuracy, if you have specific examples, we could review please get in touch with us at weeds@invasives.com.au, it would help us identify where to improve for future updates.
