Comparison

NenaMark3 vs GPUScore

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

NenaMark3

This application serves as a benchmark to measure the 3D graphics performance of a system. It gradually increases scene complexity to determine the point at which frame rates drop below 60 FPS, aiding in comparisons between different devices for gaming and 3D applications.

Highlights
  • Measures 3D graphics performance
  • Gradually increases scene complexity
  • Determines frame rate drop point
  • Compares system performance
  • Assesses suitability for 3D apps and games
Features
Read full description

Nenamark3 is a benchmark that measures the 3d performance of a system by gradually increasing the complexity of a scene until the frame rate drops below 60. Purpose Nenamark3 is run to compare different systems against each other from a 3d graphics perspective. A 3d graphics benchmark tries to show how well a system will perform in games or or apps that make use of 3d graphics. 3D Graphics Apps A 3d app, such as a game, will typically have individual settings for different tiers of devices. A lo-end system will have less features and look less amazing than a hi-end system. If hi-end settings are used on a lo-end system it will not be able to maintain its frame rate of 60 fps, causing it to drop frames and “stutter”. What a 3D benchmark should do This means that a graphics benchmark should define a set of scenes of increasing complexity and find how far a system can go while maintaining 60 fps. The common way of running static scenes and measure the fps have several problems. First, it is not relevant to run at any other frame rate than 60. It is not certain that lower fps are comparable to each other. All we can say for certain is - did it make 60 or not? Second, once 60 is reached where do you go? While it is possible to do off screen render and let the fps go as high as it can this is also irrelevant. If you have more power you would probably want more advanced features rather than more of the lesser features (perhaps you’d want a more correct lighting model rather than say more geometry). Go Slow There is a point to scaling the complexity gradually over time. Especially embedded systems have quite sophisticated clock governors that speeds up the clocks when needed, even for the GPU. These sample the load at certain intervals and adapt so it makes sense to slowly build complexity. In a game there would be a few slow frames before the system could react which would be annoying but not critical.

About

GPUScore

Read full description

GPUScore: Sacred Path is a graphics benchmark suited for a whole range of devices, from high-end mobile devices to mid-tier desktop and laptop devices. The story is a continuation from The Expedition, and precedes the one from Relic of Life. This benchmark employs latest 3D graphics rendering features and techniques used in video games, such as: - Temporal Anti-Aliasing (TAA) - Ground Truth Ambient Occlusion - Variable Rate Shading - Volumetric Lighting - etc. The application contains two Official benchmarks that submit results to Powerboard 4.0 online platform for comparison. These results can be compared with other results coming from different users. - Official: The main benchmark that uses 2540×1440 (QHD) rendering resolution - Official Native: Uses the same content and settings as Official, but uses device’s display resolution as the rendering resolution. Only available on mobile devices Additionally the application contains custom benchmark mode, which uses the same content as Official, but allows users to change settings from the default ones used in Official. Experience mode is available for previewing the benchmark content in a smooth way.

Screenshots

NenaMark34 screens
GPUScore4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: NenaMark3 at every 3 weeks against GPUScore's every 20 months. NenaMark3 also leads on iOS requirement (7.1 vs 18.5). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

NenaMark3 ships an update every 3 weeks, GPUScore every 20 months. The most recent releases landed on October 21, 2026 and October 8, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
NenaMark3 versus GPUScore: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterNenaMark3GPUScore
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews66.7% of reviews—
Number of ratings2 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 20 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS7.1 — better18.5
Further details — not scored
Size34 MB590 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperNena Innovation ABBasemark

In-app purchases

None

NenaMark3

No in-app purchases

None

GPUScore

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is NenaMark3 free?
NenaMark3 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is GPUScore free?
GPUScore is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do NenaMark3 or GPUScore have ads?
Neither NenaMark3 nor GPUScore shows ads.
Which is updated more often, NenaMark3 or GPUScore?
NenaMark3 ships an update every 3 weeks, and GPUScore every 20 months. Most recently, NenaMark3 was updated on October 21, 2026 and GPUScore on October 8, 2026.

Other comparisons