Comparison

amoCRM 2.0 vs YGROUP

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

amoCRM 2.0

This cloud-based CRM system centralizes customer communication across messengers, emails, and calls. It enables personalized dialogues and offers powerful analytics, reporting, and automation tools for sales teams.

Highlights
  • Messaging-powered CRM
  • Multi-channel communication (messengers, email, calls)
  • Personalized customer dialogues
  • Analytics and reporting
  • Sales automation tools
Features
Read full description

amoCRM is the worlds first messaging-powered CRM. Multi-channel communication lets you converse through messengers, emails, and calls from a single app. Now every interaction with your customers can be a personalized one-on-one dialogue. Plus managers love our powerful analytics, reporting and automation tools. Its the perfect messenger-based sales solution for entrepreneurs and SMBs. Get full access to amoCRM while on-the-go with our iOS app.

About

YGROUP

This app aggregates resort real estate for real estate professionals, allowing them to work with exclusive property databases, send offers to clients, and receive market news. It helps agents sell more by connecting them with thousands of other agents and provides tools to understand client preferences and save time.

Highlights
  • Access exclusive property database
  • Send property offers to clients
  • Receive market news
  • Create PDF property presentations
  • Search with over 50 filters
  • Unified database for new and resale properties
Features
Read full description

YGROUP - курортная недвижимость и инструменты для работы с ней в одном приложении. Находи объекты, готовь предложения клиентам, веди сделки и получай комиссию. Для агентов, агентств недвижимости и застройщиков. НАХОДИ НУЖНЫЕ ОБЪЕКТЫ Новостройки и вторичная недвижимость в единой базе: квартиры, дома, участки, коммерческие помещения и парковочные места. Используй фильтры и карту, сравнивай предложения и проверяй доступные лоты в шахматках новостроек. РАЗМЕЩАЙ И ПРОДАВАЙ Добавляй свои объекты в базу YGROUP и сотрудничай с другими агентами. Твои предложения становятся доступны профессионалам, которые подбирают недвижимость для своих клиентов. СОБИРАЙ ПОДБОРКИ Объединяй подходящие объекты в персональные подборки и отправляй клиентам по ссылке. Создавай PDF-презентации с твоим номером телефона и изображения для сторис прямо в приложении. ПОНИМАЙ ИНТЕРЕСЫ КЛИЕНТА Смотри, какие предложения открывал клиент и сколько времени уделил каждому объекту. Отчёты по подборкам помогут подготовиться к следующему разговору и уточнить поиск. ВЕДИ СДЕЛКИ Фиксируй клиентов и следи за ходом сделки: от заявки и бронирования до завершения и выплаты вознаграждения. Отдел продаж YGROUP помогает взаимодействовать с застройщиками и сопровождает сделки. ПОЛУЧАЙ АВАНС КОМИССИИ Проверяй доступную к авансу сумму и оформляй авансирование по доступным сделкам. Отслеживай статус выплаты в приложении. БУДЬ В КУРСЕ Следи за новыми объектами, предложениями застройщиков и новостями рынка в ленте. Данные о лотах и ценах поступают из личных кабинетов застройщиков и через интеграции с их системами. YGROUP рядом, когда ты на показе, встрече или в дороге. А для работы за компьютером есть веб-версия.

Screenshots

amoCRM 2.04 screens
YGROUP4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: YGROUP at 100% against amoCRM 2.0's 16%. YGROUP also leads on rating (5.0 vs 3.8) and monetization model (free vs freemium). amoCRM 2.0's advantage is ratings volume (24 vs 2). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

YGROUP holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.8. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: amoCRM 2.0 has 24 ratings behind it against 2, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 16% of amoCRM 2.0's written reviews are positive against 100% of YGROUP's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

amoCRM 2.0 ships an update every 9 days, YGROUP every 8 days. The most recent releases landed on October 13, 2026 and October 8, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
amoCRM 2.0 versus YGROUP: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameteramoCRM 2.0YGROUP
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.8 (24 ratings)5.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews16.5% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings24 — better2
Update frequencyEvery 9 daysEvery 8 days — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreemiumFree — better
DevicesiPhone, Apple WatchiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS16.015.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size178 MB129 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperamoCRMYGroup

Customer experience

amoCRM 2.0

All ratings24 ratings
Positive70.8%
Neutral0.0%
Negative29.2%
Written reviews79 reviews
Positive16.5%
Neutral12.7%
Negative70.9%

YGROUP

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

amoCRM 2.0

No in-app purchases

None

YGROUP

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is amoCRM 2.0 free?
amoCRM 2.0 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is YGROUP free?
YGROUP is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, amoCRM 2.0 or YGROUP?
YGROUP is rated higher. amoCRM 2.0 averages 3.8 out of 5 from 24 ratings, while YGROUP averages 5.0 from 2 ratings.
Do amoCRM 2.0 or YGROUP have ads?
Neither amoCRM 2.0 nor YGROUP shows ads.
Which is updated more often, amoCRM 2.0 or YGROUP?
amoCRM 2.0 ships an update every 9 days, and YGROUP every 8 days. Most recently, amoCRM 2.0 was updated on October 13, 2026 and YGROUP on October 8, 2026.

Other comparisons