iPro Anesthesia 2 vs TEGRotem

iPro Anesthesia v2 offers the same great features as v1 but with improved look, feel, and functionality. The additional features continue to improve documentation and patient safety as well as help to minimize medication errors. This AIMS fills the critical gaps in perioperative documentation. Plus, iPro Anesthesia will improve the efficiency of any facility by ensuring Anesthesiologists adhere to ever-changing compliance and regulatory measures. iPro Anesthesia offers an end-to-end dynamic AIMS with instantaneous access to data, and this multi-modular platform fits the needs of virtually every practice size and setting. This customizable and scalable system is designed to seamlessly integrate into even the most complex healthcare systems. iPro Anesthesia v2 offers: · A more complete patient health record · Ability to customize to providers’ desired workflow · Customizable alerts for patient safety · Device connectivity · Improved ability to share templates · Open source platform capable of integrating with other EMRs and billing · Easy-to-use and easy-to-maintain application · Secure cloud storage · Live cases feature to supervise multiple cases in real-time · Powerful analytics module to leverage your data Analytics iProcedures offers a robust reporting tool to analyze all of the data captured during the perioperative process. The reporting module provides the ability to create real time dashboards and reports, supporting seemingly infinite combinations of data elements. This information is available in real-time, and it is drillable down to the individual case or physician level. This is a very helpful tool in improving OR efficiency, reconciling narcotics, implementing best practices, identifying and reducing downward trends, helping minimize errors, and more. iProcedures delivers intuitive and flexible healthcare solutions that provide numerous benefits to the clinicians, practices, and patients.

This application cannot be used by the general public in managing any health condition. It is designed to teach specialist doctors how best to interpret viscoelastic testing results obtained from the TEG and Rotem devices, so that they may better understand the likely causes of bleeding disorders. It is not designed to influence clinical judgment. The algorithms are based on a wealth of publications in the medical literature for processing TEG and ROTEM data. The structure of the algorithms used in this app is very important, simplifying bleeding management to a stepwise approach following a physiologic process. These algorithms have been devised as a teaching tool for ease of comprehension and simulation training. See the following references for further information: : 1. Ranucci M, Aloisio T, Di Dedda U, Anguissola M, Barbaria A, Baryshnikova E. Fibrinogen and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: The Importance of the Temporal Sequence—A Post-Hoc Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(23):7137. 2. Pearse BL, Keogh S, Rickard CM, Fung YL. Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgery units: A qualitative interview study analysed with the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. BMC Health Services Research. 2020. A good summary of Rotem-guided algorithms can be found here: ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7315-9528 Korean J Anesthesiol 2019 August 72(4): 297-322 https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19169