Comparison

HeadLight Fieldbook vs UMA Project

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

HeadLight Fieldbook

This app streamlines onsite project information capture for infrastructure projects. It allows teams to quickly record inspection data, generate daily reports, and add multimedia context like photos and videos. Users can easily search archived data and flag areas of concern for immediate notification.

Highlights
  • Real-time data capture and sharing
  • Built-in daily report generation
  • Multimedia observation recording
  • Archived data search functionality
  • Flagging areas of concern
Read full description

HeadLight Fieldbook is a photo-driven inspection and verification technology used during infrastructure project delivery. It's designed exclusively for state and local transportation agencies, engineering firms that offer construction management services, and heavy-civil contractors that wish to gain easier, more effective, and less-costly ways for their teams to perform onsite project information capture. HeadLight Fieldbook Features ----------------------------- • Capture inspection data quickly and share it in real time to everyone on the project. • Daily reports are built-in so you can create and submit your documentation without leaving the field. • Add videos, photos and voice recordings to your inspection observations, creating additional clarity and context to reporting. • Find archived inspection data quickly by searching observation text, bid item numbers, contractors or custom tags that you create. • Flag areas of concern to instantly notify those who need to know.

About

UMA Project

Read full description

UMA Project is an enterprise construction management platform designed to streamline project operations, enhance collaboration, and maintain quality standards across all phases of construction. Built for organizations, UMA enables structured workflows and centralized project control in a secure and reliable environment.

Screenshots

UMA Project4 screens

Verdict

The call

HeadLight Fieldbook and UMA Project are too close to call on the numbers: across 6 compared parameters — price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases among them — neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on October 23, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

ScorecardNo meaningful differences
HeadLight Fieldbook versus UMA Project: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterHeadLight FieldbookUMA Project
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.5 (24 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews8.3% of reviews—
Number of ratings24 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPadiPhone, iPad — better
Requires iOS15.6 — better16.6
Further details — not scored
Size128 MB48 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPavia Systems IncSat Finder FZCO Ltd.

In-app purchases

None

HeadLight Fieldbook

No in-app purchases

None

UMA Project

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is HeadLight Fieldbook free?
HeadLight Fieldbook is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is UMA Project free?
UMA Project is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do HeadLight Fieldbook or UMA Project have ads?
Neither HeadLight Fieldbook nor UMA Project shows ads.
Which is updated more often, HeadLight Fieldbook or UMA Project?
HeadLight Fieldbook ships an update every 2 months, and UMA Project every 2 months. Most recently, HeadLight Fieldbook was updated on October 23, 2026 and UMA Project on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons