Comparison

eRailSafe Mobile vs PATT

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

eRailSafe Mobile

This app serves as the industry standard for contractor safety and security management within the railroad sector. It allows railroads to track contractor employee access and maintain a history, enhancing the security of personnel, operations, and facilities. Professionals can quickly verify on-site contractor status by scanning badges.

Highlights
  • Contractor safety and security management
  • Monitor contractor employee access
  • Maintain employee history
  • Verify on-site contractor status
  • Scan eRailSafe badges
  • Display virtual badge
Features
Read full description

eRailSafe is the Class 1 and ShortLine industry standard for contractor safety and security management for Railroads and the vendors that serve them. eRailSafe enables Class 1 and ShortLine Railroads to monitor and maintain a history of all contractor employees that have access to their property. The purpose of the program is to improve the security of railroad employees, operations and facilities. With the eRailSafe mobile application, Class 1 industry professionals can quickly determine the status and other program details for on-site contract employees by scanning their eRailSafe badge. Badge holders can also use their eRailSafe credentials to login to the app to show a virtual badge

About

PATT

This app helps railroads and contractors determine if a qualifying accident has occurred that requires post-accident alcohol and drug testing under FRA regulations. It aids in quick decision-making and protects employee privacy by preventing erroneous tests.

Highlights
  • Determines qualifying accidents for testing
  • Aids in quick decision-making
  • Ensures compliance with FRA regulations
  • Protects employee privacy
  • Supports post-accident testing procedures
Features
Read full description

FRA’s 49 CFR Part 219, Control of Alcohol and Drug Use contains requirements for post-accident testing if certain conditions are met. This application is intended to aid railroads and their contractors in determining when a qualifying accident has occurred that requires Part 219 Subpart C testing. The FRA’s post-accident testing program has been the cornerstone the agency’s drug and alcohol testing efforts since 1985 and pre-dates the publication of most of the rest of Part 219 and the USDOT’s testing procedures regulation, 49 CFR Part 40. Part 219 Subpart C defines the train accident/incident thresholds that require testing. This post-accident testing helps FRA accident investigators determine whether the use of drugs and alcohol by involved railroad employees or contractors may have contributed to the cause or severity of a particular accident. The goal is that each regulated employer (railroad or contractor) is fully prepared to conduct post-accident testing if a rule-triggering event occurs; that the decision to test is made quickly after reasonable inquiry and good faith judgment by an on-site supervisor. Blood and urine collections from surviving employees/contractors must be completed within for (4) hours of the accident with the proper supplies and forms; and blood, urine, and tissue collections from fatally injured personnel must be completed as soon as practicable. In addition, this application is likewise intended to protect employees from inadvertent incursions upon their right-to-privacy represented by tests performed erroneously.

Screenshots

eRailSafe Mobile3 screens
PATT1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: PATT at 5.0 against eRailSafe Mobile's 4.3. eRailSafe Mobile's advantage is update cadence (every 4 months vs every 12 months) and iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.0). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

PATT holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.3. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 4 and 4 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

eRailSafe Mobile ships an update every 4 months, PATT every 12 months. The most recent releases landed on September 18, 2026 and June 4, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
eRailSafe Mobile versus PATT: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParametereRailSafe MobilePATT
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.3 (4 ratings)5.0 (4 ratings) — better
Positive reviews100.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings44
Update frequencyEvery 4 months — betterEvery 12 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size38 MB3 MB
Age rating4+4+
DevelopereVerifile.com, Inc.Federal Railroad Administration

Customer experience

eRailSafe Mobile

All ratings4 ratings
Positive75.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative25.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

PATT

All ratings4 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

eRailSafe Mobile

No in-app purchases

None

PATT

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is eRailSafe Mobile free?
eRailSafe Mobile is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is PATT free?
PATT is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, eRailSafe Mobile or PATT?
PATT is rated higher. eRailSafe Mobile averages 4.3 out of 5 from 4 ratings, while PATT averages 5.0 from 4 ratings.
Do eRailSafe Mobile or PATT have ads?
Neither eRailSafe Mobile nor PATT shows ads.
Which is updated more often, eRailSafe Mobile or PATT?
eRailSafe Mobile ships an update every 4 months, and PATT every 12 months. Most recently, eRailSafe Mobile was updated on September 18, 2026 and PATT on June 4, 2026.

Other comparisons