Comparison

TreatHF vs ClinicalPulse

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

TreatHF

This clinical decision support tool offers personalized heart failure therapy recommendations for healthcare professionals. It guides clinicians on medication initiation, titration, and optimization based on patient indications, referencing the latest guidelines.

Highlights
  • Individualized therapy suggestions
  • Guidance on medication use
  • Patient indication entry
  • Next steps for medical therapy
  • Medication initiation and titration
  • Optimization of medication strategy
Features
Read full description

TreatHF is a clinical decision support app that provides clinicians individualized therapy suggestions for their symptomatic heart failure patients and provides guidance on the use of each therapy. • Enter patient indications • Review individualized next steps for medical therapy • Email or print a summary of the next steps • Reference detailed information for - Initiation, titration, and monitoring of each medication - Guidance for optimizing your overall medication strategy. Content in this app is derived from the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure, the 2023 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, and the 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. The information and recommendations in this clinical decision support app are not meant to represent the only or best course of care nor replace clinical judgment. Therapeutic options should be determined after discussion between the patient and their care provider.

About

ClinicalPulse

This app offers continuing education for Nurse Practitioners, featuring flexible learning formats like video, audio, and written summaries. It simplifies CE tracking and allows users to earn contact hours conveniently. The platform is designed to fit busy lifestyles and career needs.

Highlights
  • Flexible learning formats (video, audio, text)
  • Curated content from field leaders
  • Progressive CE tracking
  • Resume learning mid-episode
  • Personalized progress monitoring
  • Simplified CE redemption
Features
Read full description

ClinicalPulse™ unlocks a new era of continuing education for busy Nurse Practitioners. Developed based on real-world feedback from NPs like you, ClinicalPulse was designed to fit your lifestyle, your learning style, and the needs of your career. This all-in-one platform lets you quickly earn CE and make the most of your time: Choose how you learn best, with video or audio episodes plus written summaries and readings Content curated from the perspective of the most respected leaders in the field Our progressive CE tracking allows you to earn contact hours for any time spent watching or listening on the app Start and stop mid-episode, and pick up where you left off anytime Personalized tracking tools make it easy to monitor your progress toward your accreditation requirements Redeem CE with one short evaluation, no more pre- and post-lecture testing Earn up to 75 contact hours and 20 Rx hours with a one-year subscription Join a thriving community of Family Practice Nurse Practitioners who are prioritizing learning that fits their lives! https://learnersdigest.org/terms/

Screenshots

TreatHF4 screens
ClinicalPulse4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: TreatHF at 5.0 against ClinicalPulse's 3.9. TreatHF also leads on in-app purchases (none vs 1) and ads (none vs shown). ClinicalPulse's advantage is update cadence (every 6 weeks vs every 7 months). On price, ratings volume and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. ClinicalPulse sells 1 in-app purchase, starting at $394.99 per year. TreatHF asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

TreatHF holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.9. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 5 and 7 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

TreatHF ships an update every 7 months, ClinicalPulse every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 17, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
TreatHF versus ClinicalPulse: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterTreatHFClinicalPulse
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (5 ratings) — better3.9 (7 ratings)
Positive reviews—66.7% of reviews
Number of ratings57 — better
Update frequencyEvery 7 monthsEvery 6 weeks — better
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size13 MB227 MB
Age rating17+17+
DeveloperAmerican College of CardiologyLDI BCM LLC

Customer experience

TreatHF

All ratings5 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

ClinicalPulse

All ratings7 ratings
Positive71.4%
Neutral0.0%
Negative28.6%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

In-app purchases

None

TreatHF

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

ClinicalPulse

Subscriptions1
  • All-Inclusive CE Subscription7 Days trial$394.991 Year

Questions

Is TreatHF free?
TreatHF is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is ClinicalPulse free?
ClinicalPulse is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, TreatHF or ClinicalPulse?
TreatHF is rated higher. TreatHF averages 5.0 out of 5 from 5 ratings, while ClinicalPulse averages 3.9 from 7 ratings.
Do TreatHF or ClinicalPulse have ads?
ClinicalPulse shows ads; TreatHF does not.
Which is updated more often, TreatHF or ClinicalPulse?
TreatHF ships an update every 7 months, and ClinicalPulse every 6 weeks. Most recently, TreatHF was updated on October 17, 2026 and ClinicalPulse on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons