Comparison

Shelfr vs Required Provider

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Shelfr

This platform automates and manages planograms for FMCG and CPG companies across various markets and channels. It allows for the creation of store-specific planograms quickly, with features like camera-powered shelf measurement and offline generation.

Highlights
  • Automate planogram management
  • Generate store-specific planograms
  • Measure shelves with ARKit camera
  • View nearby stores on map
  • Save planograms to stores
  • Offline planogram generation
Read full description

Shelfr is a platform that helps FMCG and CPG companies manage and automate their planograms across multiple markets, regions and trade channels. Shelfr offers the necessary granularity to achieve store-specific planograms in a matter of seconds. Users can simply select brand, channel and generate store specific planograms. Users can measure the Shelf using the camera powered by Apple ARKit Users can view list of stores nearby via a list and a map view Users can save planograms under their corresponding stores Users can generate planogram with no Internet connection. (Offline mode)

About

Required Provider

Features
Read full description

Required is the smart solution for maintenance and facilities management in companies and establishments. It helps you track issues, schedule tasks, manage technicians, and monitor performance from anywhere. Whether you have an in-house team or need service providers, Required offers you access to a network of over 1,500 ready-to-work technicians. o) Save up to 70% of your time. o) Reduce operational costs by up to 30%. o) Full automation of maintenance requests. o) Accurate, real-time reporting. o) Mobile app for technicians and users. o) Multi-site and branch support. o) Easy integration with other systems. o) Free trial with direct technical support. Full control over maintenance, multi-site management, real-time reports, and a ready technical team — all in the Required app. Download the Required app now and start your journey toward more professional and efficient maintenance.

Screenshots

Shelfr3 screens
Required Provider4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Required Provider at every 10 days against Shelfr's every 3 weeks. On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Shelfr ships an update every 3 weeks, Required Provider every 10 days. The most recent releases landed on September 29, 2026 and September 30, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 8 level
Shelfr versus Required Provider: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterShelfrRequired Provider
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.0 (3 ratings) — better—
Number of ratings3 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeksEvery 10 days — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPod
Requires iOS14.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size92 MB73 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPiranha Byte FZ LLCNabeeh, Inc.

In-app purchases

None

Shelfr

No in-app purchases

None

Required Provider

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Shelfr free?
Shelfr is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Required Provider free?
Required Provider is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Shelfr or Required Provider have ads?
Neither Shelfr nor Required Provider shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Shelfr or Required Provider?
Shelfr ships an update every 3 weeks, and Required Provider every 10 days. Most recently, Shelfr was updated on September 29, 2026 and Required Provider on September 30, 2026.

Other comparisons