Comparison

STEMIcathAID vs COAPT Risk Score

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

STEMIcathAID

This medical app streamlines STEMI treatment by optimizing patient recognition, response, and record-keeping. It enhances communication and coordination among healthcare providers, reducing critical time to reperfusion for high-risk patients. Features include EKG upload, cardiogenic shock assessment, and live GPS tracking.

Highlights
  • EKG upload via smartphone
  • Cardiogenic shock assessment
  • STEMI patient transfer pathway
  • Live GPS tracking of EMS
  • HIPAA compliant encrypted collaboration
  • Notification system for cath lab preparation
Features
Read full description

STEMIcathAID is a patient recognition, response, and record-keeping system designed to improve outcomes through adherence the American Heart Association’s Mission:Lifeline STEMI guidelines. Early restoration of blood flow to occluded coronary vessels has been shown to significantly improve outcomes for high-risk STEMI patients. STEMIcathAID aims to improve these clinical outcomes by optimizing their treatment following many of the recommendations of the AHA by reducing the time to STEMI recognition, lead acquisition, STEMI identification, notification of the catheterization lab, and reperfusion. There are multiple personnel and steps involved in caring for these high-risk patients. STEMIcathAID takes an algorithmic approach which will enhance the coordination and communication tasks essential to rapid assessment and easy transfer of STEMI patients from the field or outside facility. It will also provide protocols for the EMS or outside hospital provider to identify patients in cardiogenic shock even before their arrival in the catheterization lab. The application will integrate live GPS tracking of the patients alongside the time the alarm was raised prompting the sense of urgency in transferring the patient. Incorporating images, videos, illustrations, and live GPS tracking of the EMS, the design will be subdivided into three main sections: 1. EKG Upload by outside facility or EMS 2. Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock 3. STEMI patient transfer pathway When a medical provider, in the field, other hospital, or outpatient office, suspects STEMI, the provider uploads the EKG by taking a picture of it with their phone. Once the EKG is uploaded, the on-call attending at the PCI-capable facility receives a notification from the application. If the attending believes the patient is experiencing a real STEMI, the pathway is activated. Upon activation, the approximately 10-12 people involved in taking care of the patient are notified so they can begin preparations. Adhering to HIPAA compliance, all users log into the encrypted application and begin to collaborate such aspects as patient vitals, shock information, and emergency vehicle current location and estimated arrival time to the cath lab. Through the optimized communication and collaboration of multiple key players in the STEMI pathway, these time-critical, vulnerable patients can begin treatment promptly.

About

COAPT Risk Score

This medical tool calculates a 2-year risk score for death and/or heart failure hospitalization in patients with specific heart conditions. It combines clinical and echocardiographic data to aid in shared decision-making regarding treatment options.

Highlights
  • Risk prediction for death and heart failure hospitalization
  • Calculates 2-year risk score
  • Combines clinical and echocardiographic variables
  • Supports shared decision-making
  • Educational tool for medical professionals
  • Based on COAPT trial data
Features
Read full description

For educational purposes and for use by medical professionals only. For patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction between 20-50%) despite best medical therapy. The COAPT Risk Score is a simple risk prediction tool created by combining clinical and echocardiographic variables in patients with heart failure (HF) and moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) who remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). The COAPT Risk Score provides valuable prognostic information regarding the 2-year risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). The score is derived from the COAPT trial population of patients with HF and moderate-to-severe or severe FMR randomized to treatment with either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip plus GDMT or GDMT alone. We can incorporate TEER in the risk score and provide updated 2-year risk of death and/or HFH which can serve as a valuable shared decision-making tool for patients and physicians as well as heart teams while deciding about TEER. Created by a team of subject-matter experts including: the director of The Mount Sinai Hospital cardiac cath lab Dr. Kini, Director of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology at the Mount Sinai Health System Dr Sharma, the Mount Sinai Hospital Surgical Director Dr. Tang, COAPT Principal Investigator Dr. Stone, and COAPT Risk Score publication author Dr. Shah.

Screenshots

STEMIcathAID4 screens
COAPT Risk Score4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: COAPT Risk Score at 5.0 against STEMIcathAID's 3.3. COAPT Risk Score also leads on iOS requirement (12.0 vs 15.1). STEMIcathAID's advantage is ratings volume (8 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

COAPT Risk Score holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: STEMIcathAID has 8 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

Scorecard3 real differences · 6 level
STEMIcathAID versus COAPT Risk Score: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSTEMIcathAIDCOAPT Risk Score
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.3 (8 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Number of ratings8 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 3 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.112.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size71 MB28 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCardiology Apps LLC

Customer experience

STEMIcathAID

All ratings8 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral12.5%
Negative37.5%

COAPT Risk Score

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

STEMIcathAID

No in-app purchases

None

COAPT Risk Score

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is STEMIcathAID free?
STEMIcathAID is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is COAPT Risk Score free?
COAPT Risk Score is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, STEMIcathAID or COAPT Risk Score?
COAPT Risk Score is rated higher. STEMIcathAID averages 3.3 out of 5 from 8 ratings, while COAPT Risk Score averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do STEMIcathAID or COAPT Risk Score have ads?
Neither STEMIcathAID nor COAPT Risk Score shows ads.

Other comparisons