Comparison

Redo TAV vs COAPT Risk Score

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Redo TAV

This app offers systematic CT analysis for planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures. It provides procedural guidance, including implant height and depth information, and allows users to generate visual reports of procedure data.

Highlights
  • Systematic CT analysis for Redo-TAV procedures
  • Valve CT appearance and dimensions
  • Step-by-step assessment guidance
  • Implant height and depth information
  • Procedural video clips
  • Procedure data and outcome reporting
Features
Read full description

The Redo TAV app provides guidelines for assessing the suitability of a transcatheter aortic valve for Redo-TAV procedures using systematic CT analysis (Redo-TAV CT planning) and provides procedural guidance (Procedural Guide) for the procedure. The algorithm behind the app has been derived from extensive research of published materials on Redo-TAV procedures, including bench and CT simulation work. - Redo-TAV CT Planning After the user selects a particular valve type and size, Redo-TAV provides them with the valve's CT appearance and dimensions. Once the second valve is chosen, the app guides the user through different steps of assessment and collates the information. Using systematic step-by-step assessment, the app ensures that no aspect of assessment is missed. The app does not make recommendations to the user but simply guides them to the next step based on their choice. - Procedural Guide Based on the first valve type and size in the patient and the second valve chosen by the user, the app provides information on the height and depth of implant. When available, the app also includes a small clip of actual implant. - Procedure Data and Outcome The user is able to input important data points if desired to create a visual report.

About

COAPT Risk Score

This medical tool calculates a 2-year risk score for death and/or heart failure hospitalization in patients with specific heart conditions. It combines clinical and echocardiographic data to aid in shared decision-making regarding treatment options.

Highlights
  • Risk prediction for death and heart failure hospitalization
  • Calculates 2-year risk score
  • Combines clinical and echocardiographic variables
  • Supports shared decision-making
  • Educational tool for medical professionals
  • Based on COAPT trial data
Features
Read full description

For educational purposes and for use by medical professionals only. For patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation and symptomatic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction between 20-50%) despite best medical therapy. The COAPT Risk Score is a simple risk prediction tool created by combining clinical and echocardiographic variables in patients with heart failure (HF) and moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) who remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). The COAPT Risk Score provides valuable prognostic information regarding the 2-year risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). The score is derived from the COAPT trial population of patients with HF and moderate-to-severe or severe FMR randomized to treatment with either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with MitraClip plus GDMT or GDMT alone. We can incorporate TEER in the risk score and provide updated 2-year risk of death and/or HFH which can serve as a valuable shared decision-making tool for patients and physicians as well as heart teams while deciding about TEER. Created by a team of subject-matter experts including: the director of The Mount Sinai Hospital cardiac cath lab Dr. Kini, Director of Clinical and Interventional Cardiology at the Mount Sinai Health System Dr Sharma, the Mount Sinai Hospital Surgical Director Dr. Tang, COAPT Principal Investigator Dr. Stone, and COAPT Risk Score publication author Dr. Shah.

Screenshots

Redo TAV4 screens
COAPT Risk Score4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is iOS requirement: COAPT Risk Score at 12.0 against Redo TAV's 15.1. On price, rating, ratings volume and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Redo TAV against 5.0 for COAPT Risk Score. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively.

Scorecard1 real difference · 8 level
Redo TAV versus COAPT Risk Score: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterRedo TAVCOAPT Risk Score
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (2 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings)
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 5 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS15.112.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size35 MB28 MB
Age rating12+17+
DeveloperKRUTSCHCardiology Apps LLC

Customer experience

Redo TAV

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

COAPT Risk Score

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Redo TAV

No in-app purchases

None

COAPT Risk Score

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Redo TAV free?
Redo TAV is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is COAPT Risk Score free?
COAPT Risk Score is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Redo TAV or COAPT Risk Score?
Redo TAV and COAPT Risk Score are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 2 and 1 ratings respectively.
Do Redo TAV or COAPT Risk Score have ads?
Neither Redo TAV nor COAPT Risk Score shows ads.

Other comparisons