AthleticFIELD vs Quick Track Meet
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
AthleticFIELD
Streamline sports event management by entering field results once. This app instantly updates online and physical scoreboards, and syncs with your meet management system. Record videos of each attempt to enhance record-keeping.
- Single-entry results input
- Instant scoreboard updates
- Meet management system sync
- Video recording for attempts
- Eliminates paper sheets
Read full descriptionHide full description
Tired of entering field results in two places: once on a sheet of paper and once in your meet management system? With AthleticField, enter results in one place. Those results will instantly populate online and physical scoreboards. Once the event is done, it only takes a couple clicks to sync those results with your meet management system. Stop using paper field event sheets; start using this app. Record videos for each attempt.
Quick Track Meet
Manage track meets directly from your mobile device. Easily set up events, add athletes, and view real-time results. Fans can follow along, and coaches can collaborate on entries. The app simplifies small track meet organization and integrates with athletic.net for results.
- Run track meets from mobile
- Quick meet setup
- Add/delete athletes on the fly
- Real-time results for fans
- Set permissions for coaches
- Copy/paste results to athletic.net
- Supports up to four teams
Read full descriptionHide full description
This app will allow you to run a small track meet from your mobile device. You can quickly set up a meet once you login. You can add/delete athletes on the fly. Fans can see the results in real-time. You can set up permissions for other coaches to add athletes and meet managers to enter marks. When the meet is over you copy and paste the results to athletic.net. Four teams is the maximum number of teams per meet. This is the easiest way to run a small track meet!
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: Quick Track Meet at 100% against AthleticFIELD's 50%. Quick Track Meet also leads on rating (4.4 vs 3.6) and iOS requirement (12.1 vs 14.0). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Quick Track Meet holds the better App Store score, 4.4 against 3.6. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 14 and 14 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 50% of AthleticFIELD's written reviews are positive against 100% of Quick Track Meet's.
AthleticFIELD ships an update monthly, Quick Track Meet every 3 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 24, 2026 and September 19, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | AthleticFIELD | Quick Track Meet |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 3.6 (14 ratings) | 4.4 (14 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 50.0% of reviews | 100.0% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 14 | 14 |
| Update frequency | Monthly | Every 3 weeks — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 14.0 | 12.1 — better |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 44 MB | 17 MB |
| Age rating | 9+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Deker Net LLC | Brian Seaver |
Customer experience
AthleticFIELD
Quick Track Meet
In-app purchases
AthleticFIELD
No in-app purchases
Quick Track Meet
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is AthleticFIELD free?
Is Quick Track Meet free?
Which has better reviews, AthleticFIELD or Quick Track Meet?
Do AthleticFIELD or Quick Track Meet have ads?
Which is updated more often, AthleticFIELD or Quick Track Meet?
Other comparisons
