Dashr vs AthleticFIELD
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Dashr
This application is designed for coaches and trainers to manage athlete testing data. It works in conjunction with specific timing hardware to record and analyze performance metrics.
- Athlete testing data management
- Works with Dashr timing hardware
- Performance metric analysis
- Coach and trainer focused
Read full descriptionHide full description
If you are an athlete looking for your testing data, please download the "Dashr Player Profile" app. This app is designed for a coach or trainer to be used alongside the Dashr timing hardware which can be purchased at www.dashrsystems.com. Please note: This app is best utilized with Dashr hardware.
AthleticFIELD
Streamline sports event management by entering field results once. This app instantly updates online and physical scoreboards, and syncs with your meet management system. Record videos of each attempt to enhance record-keeping.
- Single-entry results input
- Instant scoreboard updates
- Meet management system sync
- Video recording for attempts
- Eliminates paper sheets
Read full descriptionHide full description
Tired of entering field results in two places: once on a sheet of paper and once in your meet management system? With AthleticField, enter results in one place. Those results will instantly populate online and physical scoreboards. Once the event is done, it only takes a couple clicks to sync those results with your meet management system. Stop using paper field event sheets; start using this app. Record videos for each attempt.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: AthleticFIELD at 3.6 against Dashr's 3.4. Dashr's advantage is review sentiment (65% vs 50%) and update cadence (fortnightly vs monthly). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
AthleticFIELD holds the better App Store score, 3.6 against 3.4. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 43 and 14 respectively. Written reviews complicate that: 65% of Dashr's written reviews are positive against 50% of AthleticFIELD's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.
Dashr ships an update fortnightly, AthleticFIELD monthly. Both last shipped on October 24, 2026.
| Parameter | Dashr | AthleticFIELD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 3.4 (43 ratings) | 3.6 (14 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 65.4% of reviews — better | 50.0% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 43 — better | 14 |
| Update frequency | Fortnightly — better | Monthly |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 13.0 — better | 14.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 53 MB | 44 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 9+ |
| Developer | Dashr, LLC | Deker Net LLC |
Customer experience
Dashr
AthleticFIELD
In-app purchases
Dashr
No in-app purchases
AthleticFIELD
No in-app purchases
