Comparison

OCS vs BioCog

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side โ€” with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

OCS

Features
Read full description

OCS-Plus provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. OCS-Plus was developed by the Translational Neuropsychology Research Group at the University of Oxford. The tool has been standardised, normed and validated (Demeyere et al 2021). The tool is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups. The tool is not for self-assessment. Instead, a health professional assessor administers the screen to respondents to investigate domain-general cognitive impairments, with a specific focus on memory and executive attention. The tool contains multiple easy to administer tests and instructions are provided for each test. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70 and respondent performance is automatically compared to established normative cut offs. In order to activate the app for use, registration is required. There is no cost for the standard app version where data is not uploaded. Where data upload is required, an administration fee, as well as a collaboration agreement and datasharing agreement is required to be put in place.

About

BioCog

Features
Read full description

The BioFINDER group's digital test suite has been optimised to effectively isolate problems with cognitive health, testing several domains relevant to the onset of cognitive impairment and potential Alzheimer's disease. It has been developed and compiled by experienced neurologists and neuropsychiatrists and includes immediate and delayed memory recall, symbol digit test, trail making, face-occupation and orientation. A study-related active ID is required to perform the tests. The user will be guided through the tests with text and voice-over, for which the following languages are currently supported: Swedish, English, Dutch, Italian, Spanish, Catalan and Finnish.

Screenshots

OCS4 screens
BioCog4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: BioCog at monthly against OCS's every 12 months. OCS's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 17.6). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price ยท Rating ยท Positive reviews ยท Number of ratings ยท Update frequency ยท Ads ยท In-app purchases ยท Monetization ยท Best chart rank ยท Devices ยท Requires iOS

CostPrice ยท In-app purchases ยท Ads ยท Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

OCS ships an update every 12 months, BioCog monthly. Both last shipped on October 5, 2026.

Scorecard2 real differences ยท 4 level
OCS versus BioCog: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterOCSBioCog
PriceFreeFree
Update frequencyEvery 12 monthsMonthly โ€” better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod โ€” betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS11.0 โ€” better17.6
Further details โ€” not scored
Size138 MB55 MB
Age rating12+4+
DeveloperUniversity of OxfordLund University

In-app purchases

None

OCS

No in-app purchases

None

BioCog

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is OCS free?
OCS is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is BioCog free?
BioCog is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do OCS or BioCog have ads?
Neither OCS nor BioCog shows ads.
Which is updated more often, OCS or BioCog?
OCS ships an update every 12 months, and BioCog monthly. Most recently, OCS was updated on October 5, 2026 and BioCog on October 5, 2026.

Other comparisons