Sezam Park vs HitProxy
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Sezam Park
Control barriers and gates connected to the Sezam remote dispatch system. Create guest access requests for convenient entry. Manage your property's access remotely.
- Open barriers and gates
- Create guest access requests
- Remote dispatch management
- Manage property access
Read full descriptionHide full description
Открывайте шлагбаумы и делайте гостевые заявки на проездах (шлагбаумах или воротах), подключенных к удалённой диспетчеризации Sezam.
HitProxy
This app offers a secure and encrypted internet connection using modern VPN protocols. It features a user-friendly interface for easy setup by pasting a tunnel link, ensuring maximum speed and privacy with no logs stored.
- Secure and encrypted connection
- Supports VLESS and WireGuard protocols
- Easy setup via tunnel link
- User-friendly iOS interface
- No logs stored
- Maximum speed
Read full descriptionHide full description
HitProxy is a mobile client that provides a secure and encrypted connection for internet access. The app supports modern protocols: VLESS and WireGuard. To set up the app, simply paste a tunnel link from any provider. FEATURES – User-friendly iOS app – Easy setup via link – Strong encryption – No logs stored – Maximum speed PRIVACY POLICY None of the information you provide to the app is transmitted to us. HitProxy does not collect or store your data. We do not access your device information or share any data with third parties. If you have any questions about our Privacy Policy, feel free to contact us at: support@hitproxy.net CONTACT If you have any questions about HitProxy, reach out to us: support@hitproxy.net THIRD-PARTY LICENSES This app includes code from WireGuard, developed by Jason A. Donenfeld and licensed under the Apache License v2.0. It also uses code from Xray-core by Project-X, licensed under the Mozilla Public License v2.0.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: Sezam Park at 4.7 against HitProxy's 3.2. Sezam Park also leads on review sentiment (56% vs 45%). HitProxy's advantage is ratings volume (171 vs 6). On price, update cadence, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Sezam Park holds the better App Store score, 4.7 against 3.2. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: HitProxy has 171 ratings behind it against 6, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 56% of Sezam Park's written reviews are positive against 45% of HitProxy's.
Sezam Park ships an update every 5 weeks, HitProxy every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 14, 2026 and October 8, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Sezam Park | HitProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.7 (6 ratings) — better | 3.2 (171 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 55.6% of reviews — better | 44.6% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 6 | 171 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 5 weeks — better | Every 6 weeks |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod, Apple Watch | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 14.0 — better | 15.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 59 MB | 84 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Aleksei Babchenko | Airsharp LTD |
Customer experience
Sezam Park
HitProxy
Bugs and requests
Sezam Park
Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.
HitProxy
Reported bugs
2 issues- App crashes on certain devices
- Unreliable connection on mobile data
Requested features
3 requests- Improved server selection
- Automatic reconnect option
- Traffic usage monitoring
In-app purchases
Sezam Park
No in-app purchases
HitProxy
No in-app purchases
