Comparison

樱岛屋 vs 乐酷淘

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

樱岛屋

Discover a vast selection of Japanese fashion brands, from classic styles to alternative subcultures. Enjoy direct shipping from Japan with guaranteed authenticity and multiple international logistics options. Purchase easily with real-time exchange rates and Alipay, all supported by a dedicated team for a seamless shopping experience.

Highlights
  • Wide range of Japanese fashion styles
  • Authentic products direct from Japan
  • Multiple international shipping options
  • Easy purchasing with Alipay
  • Professional代购 (personal shopper) team
  • Real-time exchange rates
Features
Read full description

【日系品牌,海量商品】 从经典日系OL、淑女到新式地雷系量产型亚文化应有尽有。实现你的日系穿搭自由! 【日本直邮,正品保证】 EMS,航空,SAL,海运等多种国际物流按需选择,贴心细致的包装更省心! 【简便流程,轻松购买】 简便快捷的购物流程,无需外卡转运,实时汇率支付宝一键下单坐等商品到家! 【专业团队,贴心服务】 专业代购团队快速下单,在线人工客服快速响应,售前售后给您无忧的购物体验!

About

乐酷淘

This app facilitates quick purchasing of items from Japanese online marketplaces like Mercari and Rakuma. It offers direct search and buying capabilities, with potential access to official discounted prices on select items.

Highlights
  • Search Japanese Mercari items
  • Quick buy Mercari products
  • Access official Mercari discounts
  • Search Japanese Rakuma items
  • Buy Rakuma products
  • Contact customer service
Read full description

乐酷淘是日本煤炉官方合作伙伴,提供日本煤炉平台商品的秒切服务,您可以通过乐酷淘APP搜索和快速购买日本煤炉上的商品,并且部分商品支持煤炉的官方折扣价格购买。 同时我们还在接入了日本乐天二手平台Rakuma,您可以通过我们平台搜索和购买Rakuma的商品。感谢您的支持,如有任何问题欢迎通过个人中心联系在线客服。

Screenshots

樱岛屋4 screens
乐酷淘4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: 樱岛屋 at 3.7 against 乐酷淘's 3.0. 樱岛屋 also leads on review sentiment (83% vs 63%). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

樱岛屋 holds the better App Store score, 3.7 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 2 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 83% of 樱岛屋's written reviews are positive against 63% of 乐酷淘's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

樱岛屋 ships an update fortnightly, 乐酷淘 every 2 weeks. The most recent releases landed on September 27, 2026 and September 28, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
樱岛屋 versus 乐酷淘: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter樱岛屋乐酷淘
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.7 (3 ratings) — better3.0 (2 ratings)
Positive reviews83.3% of reviews — better63.3% of reviews
Number of ratings3 — better2
Update frequencyFortnightly — betterEvery 2 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS12.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size65 MB60 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperChengdu SIG Service Technology Co., LtdZhuhai Youjigongfang Network Technology Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

樱岛屋

All ratings3 ratings
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews24 reviews
Positive83.3%
Neutral4.2%
Negative12.5%

乐酷淘

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews30 reviews
Positive63.3%
Neutral6.7%
Negative30.0%

In-app purchases

None

樱岛屋

No in-app purchases

None

乐酷淘

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is 樱岛屋 free?
樱岛屋 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is 乐酷淘 free?
乐酷淘 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, 樱岛屋 or 乐酷淘?
樱岛屋 is rated higher. 樱岛屋 averages 3.7 out of 5 from 3 ratings, while 乐酷淘 averages 3.0 from 2 ratings.
Do 樱岛屋 or 乐酷淘 have ads?
Neither 樱岛屋 nor 乐酷淘 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, 樱岛屋 or 乐酷淘?
樱岛屋 ships an update fortnightly, and 乐酷淘 every 2 weeks. Most recently, 樱岛屋 was updated on September 27, 2026 and 乐酷淘 on September 28, 2026.

Other comparisons