Comparison

SFH Installer vs CDK ServiceView

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

SFH Installer

This application offers installation guides for automotive electronic systems. It caters to individuals working with car electronics, providing necessary instructions for various installations.

Highlights
  • Automotive electronics installation instructions
  • Guides for car electronics
  • Focus on automotive systems
Features
Read full description

The purpose of the app is to provide installation instructions for automotive electronics. Automotive, Automotive Electronics

About

CDK ServiceView

This app allows users to record, upload, and share videos with clients or colleagues. It's designed for businesses to communicate visually with individuals who cannot be present. Various industries can benefit from its video communication capabilities.

Highlights
  • Create customer entries
  • Record multiple videos
  • Upload videos to cloud
  • Email video links
  • Text video links
Features
Read full description

NOTE: This app must be used in conjunction with a CDK customer account. CDK is a video platform for recording, sending and tracking videos. The CDK iOS app allows users to: - Create a customer entry - Record one or multiple videos - Upload recorded videos to the cloud - Email a link to those videos - Text a link to those videos The CDK app is effective in sharing narrated video with individuals who are unable to be physically present. Markets for this app include automotive service, automotive sales, pest control, insurance claims, real estate, home inspections and many others.

Screenshots

SFH Installer4 screens
CDK ServiceView2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: CDK ServiceView at 1.7 against SFH Installer's 1.0. SFH Installer's advantage is iOS requirement (12.0 vs 16.0). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

CDK ServiceView holds the better App Store score, 1.7 against 1.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 5 and 11 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on November 3, 2026 and October 30, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
SFH Installer versus CDK ServiceView: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSFH InstallerCDK ServiceView
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.0 (5 ratings)1.7 (11 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings511 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad
Requires iOS12.0 — better16.0
Further details — not scored
Size32 MB139 MB
Age rating4+17+
DeveloperSafety F1rst Holdings, LLCTruVideo, Inc.

In-app purchases

None

SFH Installer

No in-app purchases

None

CDK ServiceView

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is SFH Installer free?
SFH Installer is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is CDK ServiceView free?
CDK ServiceView is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, SFH Installer or CDK ServiceView?
CDK ServiceView is rated higher. SFH Installer averages 1.0 out of 5 from 5 ratings, while CDK ServiceView averages 1.7 from 11 ratings.
Do SFH Installer or CDK ServiceView have ads?
Neither SFH Installer nor CDK ServiceView shows ads.
Which is updated more often, SFH Installer or CDK ServiceView?
SFH Installer ships an update every 2 months, and CDK ServiceView every 2 months. Most recently, SFH Installer was updated on November 3, 2026 and CDK ServiceView on October 30, 2026.

Other comparisons