Gqtc vs Philips Home Camera
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Gqtc
Visualize ear canal and facial pore cleaning with real-time camera feeds. Capture photos and videos of the process, and utilize features like focus, wide-angle, and a lock screen to prevent accidental touches.
- Real-time ear canal visualization
- Real-time facial pore visualization
- Focus and wide-angle options
- Photo and video capture
- Accidental touch lock screen
Read full descriptionHide full description
手机连接设备WiFi，满足采耳棒/洁面黑头仪等设备的可视化需求。 采耳:APP实时显示耳道清理画面，拒绝盲掏！ 洁面：APP实时显示面部黑头污垢 清理过程中可以开启聚焦、广角、拍照、录像、防止误触的锁屏功能 更多图像传输应用产品敬请期待！
Philips Home Camera
Monitor and manage your home or commercial spaces with real-time video, motion detection, and smart alarms. This app facilitates two-way communication and secure playback, connecting you to your property.
- Real-time video monitoring
- Motion detection alerts
- Smart alarms
- Two-way audio calls
- Local and cloud playback
- Home and commercial space management
Read full descriptionHide full description
Philips Home Camera APP is an application designed specifically for Philips brand cameras. Through real-time video monitoring, motion detection, smart alarms, two-way calls, local and cloud security playback and other functions, it provides users with a safe and convenient way to monitor and manage home or commercial spaces, helping people and homes to better connect and interact, and using technology to promote a better life.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: Philips Home Camera at 92% against Gqtc's 0%. Philips Home Camera also leads on rating (5.0 vs 2.3) and update cadence (every 5 days vs every 4 weeks). Gqtc's advantage is monetization model (free vs ad-supported) and ratings volume (3 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Philips Home Camera holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 2.3. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 3 and 1 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 0% of Gqtc's written reviews are positive against 92% of Philips Home Camera's.
Gqtc ships an update every 4 weeks, Philips Home Camera every 5 days. The most recent releases landed on October 24, 2026 and October 29, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Gqtc | Philips Home Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 2.3 (3 ratings) | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | 91.9% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 3 — better | 1 |
| Update frequency | Every 4 weeks | Every 5 days — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free — better | Ad-supported |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 11.0 — better | 15.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 9 MB | 360 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Guqiao Electronic Science & Technology (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. | TP Vision Europe B.V. |
Customer experience
Gqtc
Philips Home Camera
In-app purchases
Gqtc
No in-app purchases
Philips Home Camera
No in-app purchases
