Comparison

eDispatches vs QM Secure

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

eDispatches

This app keeps first responders connected and informed with real-time incident notifications, audio dispatches, and team response tracking. It facilitates communication and provides critical location data for efficient emergency response.

Highlights
  • Push notifications for emergency incidents
  • Listen to recorded audio dispatches
  • View CAD alerts
  • Track team response locations
  • Stream audio from equipment
  • Mark important points of interest
  • View team availability
  • Chat and send priority messages
Read full description

Trusted by hundreds of thousands of first responders across North America, eDispatches helps your team stay connected, informed, and ready to respond when seconds count. With the eDispatches app, you can: • Receive push notifications for emergency incidents • Listen to recorded audio dispatches • View CAD alerts, sent directly from your dispatch center • View your team’s response, including their location, when responding to incidents • Listen to streaming audio from your eDispatches equipment • Mark the location of hydrants and other important points of interest • View your team's availability to help plan for future incidents • Chat with and send priority messages to your team Please note that in order to use this app, your agency must already be a subscriber to the eDispatches service. Learn more at www.eDispatches.com

About

QM Secure

This secure browser is designed for taking online tests and exams. It prevents cheating by disabling features like task-switching and screen captures, ensuring a fair assessment environment.

Highlights
  • Secure testing environment
  • Prevents cheating
  • Disables task-switching
  • Blocks screen captures
  • Protects content integrity
  • Supports online exams
Features
Read full description

Questionmark Secure for iPad enables participants to take and complete online tests and exams delivered via Questionmark OnDemand or Questionmark Perception. Questionmark Secure is designed to provide a secure environment for online tests and exams that reduces the risk of cheating and complements an organization’s other defenses for mitigating threats to content security and results integrity. Academic institutions, businesses and governmental organizations use Questionmark’s technologies to create, deliver and report on online tests and exams. These online assessments may be delivered via a standard browser, such as Safari, Firefox, Internet Explorer, etc. However, certain high-stakes tests and exams warrant the additional protections provided by Questionmark Secure, including: preventing the copying or printing exam material; accidentally exiting a test; gaining access to materials (either locally or Internet-based) that could give an unfair advantage. Questionmark Secure delivers online assessment content while disabling key system functions such as task-switching, screen captures and other functions that might jeopardize the fair and secure completion of the assessment. For more information, visit the Questionmark website at https://www.questionmark.com/

Screenshots

eDispatches4 screens
QM Secure1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: eDispatches at 50% against QM Secure's 0%. eDispatches also leads on rating (4.4 vs 1.0) and update cadence (monthly vs every 18 months). QM Secure's advantage is ads (none vs shown) and monetization model (free vs ad-supported). On price, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

eDispatches holds the better App Store score, 4.4 against 1.0. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: eDispatches has 449 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 50% of eDispatches's written reviews are positive against 0% of QM Secure's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

eDispatches ships an update monthly, QM Secure every 18 months. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and November 1, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
eDispatches versus QM Secure: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParametereDispatchesQM Secure
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.4 (449 ratings) — better1.0 (3 ratings)
Positive reviews50.0% of reviews — better0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings449 — better3
Update frequencyMonthly — betterEvery 18 months
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supportedFree — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS15.015.0
Further details — not scored
Size57 MB1 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPenguin Management, Inc.Questionmark Computing Limited

Customer experience

eDispatches

All ratings431 ratings
Positive84.9%
Neutral4.4%
Negative10.7%
Written reviews68 reviews
Positive50.0%
Neutral11.8%
Negative38.2%

QM Secure

All ratings3 ratings
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%
Written reviews7 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

Bugs and requests

eDispatches

Reported bugs

21 issues
  • Alerts section crashes app consistently
  • Audio playback fails on live feed
  • App crashes on startup (50% failure rate reported)
  • Login greyed out and non-functional
  • App unable to load despite good connection
Show 16 more
  • Incidents fail to load or page freezes when refreshing
  • Notifications not appearing in iOS settings
  • Notification swipe opens app briefly then closes
  • Recording truncated or missing voice messages
  • Recordings unplayable after 5 days despite being in history
  • App fails to send notifications for dispatches
  • Incorrect notification sound after updates
  • No alert despite radio/pager activation
  • Static-filled voice messages
  • Delayed transmission of calls (15+ seconds)
  • Silent calls with no audio playback
  • Login continuously loading/clocking
  • Blank screen when trying to listen to past calls
  • Missing play, fast forward, rewind, volume controls
  • App removed from iOS settings after reinstall
  • Recording length limited to ~38 seconds

Requested features

18 requests
  • Apple Watch compatibility
  • Apple CarPlay integration
  • Adjustable alert tone duration
  • SMS notifications from consistent number for whitelisting
  • Call log feature on mobile app with public notifications
Show 13 more
  • On-scene status indicator for units
  • GPS tracking and geofencing features
  • Auto-play audio on iPhone (like Android)
  • Screen rotation support for iPad mounting
  • Landscape orientation support
  • Map integration for address location
  • Customizable notification options
  • Family alert notifications
  • Volume control for alerts
  • More alert tone options
  • Automatic availability status based on location
  • Display exact dispatch time instead of 'minutes ago'
  • Weekly reminder notifications for status updates

QM Secure

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

In-app purchases

None

eDispatches

No in-app purchases

None

QM Secure

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is eDispatches free?
eDispatches is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is QM Secure free?
QM Secure is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, eDispatches or QM Secure?
eDispatches is rated higher. eDispatches averages 4.4 out of 5 from 449 ratings, while QM Secure averages 1.0 from 3 ratings.
Do eDispatches or QM Secure have ads?
eDispatches shows ads; QM Secure does not.
Which is updated more often, eDispatches or QM Secure?
eDispatches ships an update monthly, and QM Secure every 18 months. Most recently, eDispatches was updated on November 6, 2026 and QM Secure on November 1, 2026.

Other comparisons